Back

Second-order elasticities for Ecology and Evolution: Unravelling nonlinear fitness responses to perturbations

Kajin, M.; Tuljapurkar, S. D.; ZUO, W.; Jaggi, H.; Gascoigne, S.; Salguero-Gomez, R.

2025-05-04 ecology
10.1101/2025.04.30.651456 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In ecology and evolutionary biology, understanding the relationship between vital rates (e.g., survival, development, reproduction) and population growth is essential to elucidate how life history strategies are shaped by natural selection. However, the established demographic methods to decipher the relationship between vital rates and population growth often analyse only the linear changes in population fitness as a result of changes in vital rates, thus simplifying the complexities of said relationships. To overcome the widespread linearity simplification, here we introduce the second-order elasticities of mean population fitness, the S-elasticity. The S-elasticity quantifies how changes in one or more vital rates can produce a second-order change in mean fitness. We provide a systematic mathematical framework behind the S-elasticity, revealing its ability to identify the convex and concave responses of mean fitness to perturbations of vital rates. Through structured population models, we demonstrate the distinct roles of linear and nonlinear mean fitness responses, and their combination, enabling to characterise local concavity/convexity of the mean population fitness function. We illustrate the application and the differences of S-elasticities and their biological meanings using matrix population models of the armadillo (Dasupys novemcinctus) and Pynes plum (Astragallus bibullatus). These two case studies showcase how the S-elasticity provides key insights into mean fitness responses to perturbations on demographic process and their correlations. We discuss the improvements that the S-elasticity provides for species management and our understanding of how natural populations cope with environmental change.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
2
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
Theoretical Ecology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
4
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
5
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
6
Population Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
7
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
9
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
10
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
11
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
12
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
13
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.1%
14
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
15
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
18
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Evolutionary Ecology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
20
Theoretical Population Biology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
27
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%