Impacts of the United Kingdom Soft Drinks Industry Levy: a systems-thinking informed systematic scoping review
Jones, C. P.; Adams, J.; Alvarado, M.; Forde, H.; Rutter, H.; Phillips, V.; Armstrong-Moore, R.; Demers-Potvin, E.; Briggs, A.; Cummins, S.; Mytton, O.; Penney, T. L.; Rayner, M.; Rogers, N.; Scarborough, P.; Smith, R.; White, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundConsumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) is associated with weight, weight gain and incidence of a number of chronic diseases. The World Health Organization recommends taxation on SSBs to reduce consumption. In 2018 the United Kingdom introduced the Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL), a tiered tax on manufacturers and importers of SSBs. We aimed to review the consequences of the SDIL across all potential outcomes, informed by a systems thinking approach, to understand the range and importance of its effects. MethodsWe undertook a systematic scoping review of empirical studies of the SDIL. We used a conceptual systems map of the hypothesised pathways of effect to inform data extraction and narrative synthesis. Findings are presented in an evidence map and their consistency assessed. Results38 studies met our inclusion criteria. The SDIL was consistently associated with reformulation of soft drinks to reduce sugar content. It was also consistently associated with: reduced purchasing of sugar from eligible drinks without increasing purchasing of substitute products such as alcohol and confectionary; longer-term improvements in acute and chronic health outcomes; and reduced health and social care costs, with few negative economic impacts for industry. ConclusionsBy systematically mapping all outcomes evaluated, we have demonstrated the systemic and interconnected impacts of the SDIL. Further research should seek deeper understanding of how to evaluate such interventions as events in complex adaptive systems.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 94%
- Beyond social prescribing - the use of social return on investment (SROI) analysis in integrated health and social care interventions in England and Wales: a protocol for a systematic review 94%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 93%
- Impact of a sanitation intervention on quality of life and mental wellbeing in low-income urban neighbourhoods of Maputo, Mozambique 93%
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of the Kunonga Framework for Extending Approaches in Health Inequality and Inequity Evidence Syntheses 93%
- Assessing the impact of a mandatory calorie labelling policy in out-of-home food outlets in England on consumer behaviour: a natural experimental study 92%
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 93%
- Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol 93%
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.