Back

Development of an Open-source Low-cost Pressure Myography and Cardiac Flow Simulator, HemoLens, for Mechanical Characterization of Native and Engineered Blood Vessels

PereiraTavares, A. J.; Aranda-Michel, L.; Hahn, S. A.; Coffin, B. D.; Ashraf, S. F.; Szafron, J. M.; Straub, A. C.; Shiwarski, D. J.

2025-05-04 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.04.29.651300 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pressure myography, the standard for assessing vascular mechanics and vasoreactivity, is costly ($40,000+), has low throughput, and is limited to static fluid flow. Here, we developed HemoLens, an open-source 3D-printed pressure myography system for [~]$700. HemoLens features compact micromanipulators, incremental in-line pressure control, physiological temperature regulation, and modular pulse pressure control between normotensive and hypertensive levels. HemoLens efficacy was demonstrated by delineation of physiological reactivity and pathological mechanical phenotypes using native mouse arteries and bioprinted acellular scaffolds. Wildtype vessels show greater distention (124.3 vs. 43.07 {micro}m) and increased dynamic compliance compared to diseased vessels. Small diameter (450 {micro}m) collagen-based artery-like scaffolds are FRESH bioprinted to mimic hypertensive vascular stiffening. Engineered hypertensive vessels demonstrate increased burst pressure (464 mmHg) and reduced dynamic compliance reminiscent of diseased arteries. Together, HemoLens lowers the barrier to entry in pressure myography research by serving as a comprehensive low-cost system for native and engineered vessel characterization. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=90 SRC="FIGDIR/small/651300v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (33K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6b87d0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a17b5eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@aa6056org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19ac816_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.