Datasheet for the IDHea Primary Care Screening Dataset: A Real-World Ocular Imaging Resource for Research
Chopra, R.; Guzman, A.; Uotila, J.; Bartolovich, J.; Liu, J.; Khawaja, A. P.; Keane, P. A.; Lungren, M. P.; Coelho, J.; Durbin, M. K.
Show abstract
PurposeOcular screening in primary care is increasingly recognized as a valuable opportunity to detect a wide range of eye conditions at an early stage, especially among individuals with systemic risk factors. The Primary Care Screening dataset is a large-scale, real-world collection of de-identified color fundus photographs (CFP) acquired during routine diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening visits in primary care clinics across the United States, and is available through the Institute for Digital Health (IDHea)--a secure research platform established by Topcon Healthcare, Inc. MethodsThe dataset includes CFP from individuals who participated in eye screening at 643 clinical sites in the United States. The majority of images were obtained using the TRC-NW400 (Topcon Corp., Tokyo, Japan), although other imaging devices were also used. Each image was graded by an eye care specialist using the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) grading system. Graders also recorded image quality and a wide range of other retinal findings. The dataset also includes patient-level demographics including age, sex, and 3-digit ZIP code, image metadata, along with model-generated annotations such as AutoMorph image quality, vascular metrics, and retinal pigment scores. ResultsAs of March 2025, the dataset includes 427,182 CFP from 161,705 subjects, representing 372,528 eyes and 186,264 individual visits. Image quality was graded as Excellent or Good (218,139 eyes), Fair (109,127 eyes), or Unreadable (37,491 eyes). Most eyes (n = 293,391) had no diabetic retinopathy present (NDRP), while 15,514 had mild non-proliferative DR (NPDR), 10,856 moderate NPDR, 1,140 severe NPDR, and 1,644 proliferative DR. Diabetic macular edema was present in 4-34% of NPDR categories and 18% of proliferative DR cases. Additional findings included drusen or pigmentary changes (n = 9,649), glaucoma suspect (n = 4,257), and macular degeneration (n = 3,581). ConclusionThe Primary Care Screening dataset represents one of the largest real-world collections of retinal images acquired in primary care settings. Its size, diversity, and detailed expert grading make it a valuable resource for research into automated screening, ocular disease prevalence, and AI model development. An independent Data Access and Governance committee oversees research applications to ensure responsible use. The dataset will be made available via the secure IDHea research platform. More information is available at IDHea.net.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards implementation of AI in New Zealand national screening program: Cloud-based, Robust, and Bespoke 96%
- Prediction of the ectasia screening index from raw Casia2 volume data for keratoconus identification by using convolutional neural networks 95%
- Glaucoma Detection and Staging from Visual Field Images using Machine Learning Techniques 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relating Standardized Automated Perimetry Performed with Stimulus Sizes III and V in Eyes With Field Loss due to Glaucoma and NAION 94%
- Identification of Risk Factors for Glaucoma Progression in Free-Text Clinical Notes using a Local Small Language Model 94%
- Low-cost, Smartphone-based Specular Imaging and Automated Analysis of the Corneal Endothelium 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting papilloedema as a marker of raised intracranial pressure using artificial intelligence: a systematic review 95%
- An Inherently Interpretable AI model improves Screening Speed and Accuracy for Early Diabetic Retinopathy 95%
- Self-supervised contrastive learning improves machine learning discrimination of full thickness macular holes from epiretinal membranes in retinal OCT scans 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unveiling the Clinical Incapabilities: A Benchmarking Study of GPT-4V(ision) for Ophthalmic Multimodal Image Analysis 96%
- Autonomous Screening for Laser Photocoagulation in Fundus Images Using Deep Learning 96%
- Automated Expert-level Scleral Spur Detection and Quantitative Biometric Analysis on the ANTERION Anterior Segment OCT System 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.