Predicting Organ Rejections for Pediatric Heart Transplantations with a Combined Use of Transplant Registry Data and Electronic Health Records
Bhasuran, B.; Wang, X.; Gupta, D.; Killian, M.; He, Z.
Show abstract
ObjectivePediatric heart transplantation is challenged by limited donor organ availability, prolonged waitlist times, and elevated risks of late acute rejection (LAR) and hospitalization. Current predictive models for post-transplant outcomes lack high accuracy due to reliance on registry data without integrating dynamic clinical and social factors. This study aimed to improve predictive performance and model interpretability by incorporating electronic health records (EHR), social determinants of health (SDoH), and United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data. Materials and MethodsWe used EHR and UNOS data from 111 pediatric heart transplant patients (ages 0-18) at the University of Florida Health Shands Childrens Hospital to build predictive models for organ rejection at 1-, 3-, and 5-year intervals post-transplant. UNOS data includes pre- and post-transplant health and medical records, encompassing procedures, clinical evaluations, and post-transplant follow-up information, EHR data included evolving clinical parameters (e.g., comorbidities, medication adherence, and laboratory results), while SDoH encompassed socioeconomic status, living conditions, and healthcare access. Feature importance was assessed using Shapley Variable Importance Cloud (ShapleyVIC), which integrates Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to provide robust, interpretable insights across nearly optimal models. ResultsModels integrating EHR, SDoH, and UNOS data outperformed those using UNOS data alone, with AUROC of 0.743 (0.607-0.879), 0.798 (0.725-0.871), and 0.760 (0.692-0.828). Key predictors of rejection included severe pre-transplant conditions (e.g., life support, prolonged waitlist times), elevated bilirubin and creatinine levels, and social factors (e.g., transportation barriers, BMI, insurance type). DiscussionFindings reveal the importance of integrating clinical and social data to address multisystem dysfunction, disparities in healthcare access, and adherence challenges. ShapleyVIC enhanced model interpretability, providing actionable insights for improving post-transplant care. ConclusionHolistic, data-driven approaches that combine EHR, SDoH, and registry data significantly enhance predictive accuracy and interpretability, supporting improved long-term outcomes for pediatric heart transplant patients.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 95%
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 95%
- Optimized Feature Selection and Advanced Machine Learning for Stroke Risk Prediction in Revascularized Coronary Artery Disease Patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 94%
- Generalizability Challenges of Mortality Risk Prediction Models: A Retrospective Analysis on a Multi-center Database 92%
- Predictability and Stability Testing to Assess Clinical Decision Instrument Performance for Children After Blunt Torso Trauma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting mortality in SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) positive patients in the inpatient setting using a Novel Deep Neural Network 94%
- Image and structured data analysis for prognostication of health outcomes in patients presenting to the Emergency Department during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Assessing the effects of data drift on the performance of machine learning models used in clinical sepsis prediction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients 94%
- Evaluating the kidney disease progression using a comprehensive patient profiling algorithm: A hybrid clustering approach 94%
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.