Experiences of accessing primary care by those living with long Covid in New Zealand.
Rhodes, S.; Douglas, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundLong Covid is the persistence of symptoms beyond 12 weeks following acute Covid-19 infection. It is estimated to affect one in ten people and can be extremely debilitating. With few publicly funded long Covid clinics, most people rely on primary care providers as a first point of contact. There is currently limited understanding of the experience of accessing primary health care by adults living with long Covid in New Zealand. PurposeTo explore the experiences of accessing primary health care by adults living with long Covid. MethodsA narrative inquiry approach was used to capture participants lived experiences of accessing primary health care. Zoom interviews and discussions were conducted with study participants. The automatically generated transcripts were reviewed and corrected and the collated data were analysed using Braun and Clarkes thematic analysis. ResultsEighteen people participated in the interviews. Codes were identified and, through an iterative process, themes were generated, reviewed, and named. The seven themes included lack of upskilling of primary care staff; let down by the Government; self-advocacy and its cost; and throwing money at it. Conclusion(s)The picture painted by participants was bleak with a sense that the world had moved on from Covid-19 and left them behind, with some experiencing a lack of support in primary health care. Better support might be achieved through a public awareness campaign for improved delivery of credible information, and greater utilisation of the allied health workforce.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 96%
- The public views of and reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic in England- a qualitative study with diverse ethnicities 95%
- The impact of the first wave of COVID-19 on those with lifelong conditions: a case study of congenital heart disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 96%
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 96%
- Factors influencing referral to maternity models of care in Australian general practice 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 on Migrants’ Access to Primary Care: A National Qualitative Study 95%
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 95%
- Factors influencing focused practice: A qualitative study of resident and early-career family physician practice choices 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 96%
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 96%
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 98%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 97%
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.