Back

Influence of simplifications on FE modelling of mandible and TMJ implants

Chandra, G.; Verma, V.; Ghosh, R.; Kaur, K.; Roychoudhury, A.; Mukherjee, S.; Chawla, A.; Mukherjee, K.

2025-05-01 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.04.28.651047 bioRxiv
Show abstract

End-stage temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders often necessitate joint replacement to restore bilateral mastication. Patient-specific TMJ implants typically rely on detailed in silico modelling derived from subject-specific computed tomography (CT) scans of the mandible. However, generating highly detailed finite element (FE) models is computationally expensive. Although structural simplifications of the mandible are known to influence mechanical behaviour, their quantitative impact on TMJ implant evaluation has not been systematically investigated. This study examines the influence of three modelling simplifications on stress-strain predictions in intact and implanted mandibles: (i) a detailed segmented mandible with tissue-specific material properties (Model 1), (ii) a simplified mandible comprising cortical bone only (Model 2), and (iii) a further simplified mandible excluding dental crowns (Model 3). Both narrow and standard TMJ implants were analysed under osseointegrated and non-osseointegrated conditions, resulting in fifteen FE models. Physiological clenching activities were simulated. Compared with the detailed model, simplified models showed reductions of up to 50% in maximum principal strain in bone and up to 44% in von Mises stress in TMJ implants, while preserving spatial stress-strain trends. These findings indicate that simplified models may be suitable for preliminary implant design, whereas detailed FE modelling remains essential for final pre-clinical evaluation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
3
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.1%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
15
JBMR Plus
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
21
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
22
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%