Predicting Positive Psychological States using Machine Learning and Digital Biomarkers from Everyday Wearable Data
Wu, L.; John, A.; Simoes, J.
Show abstract
Wearable devices offer continuous physiological data collection, presenting new opportunities for real-world mental health monitoring. Previous research has primarily emphasized detecting stress and psychological states associated with mental illnesses, whereas predicting positive psychological states, such as self-esteem, positive affect, and meaning in life, remains underexplored. In this study, 34 participants wore research-grade smartwatches over an eight-day period, resulting in 6,528 hours of physiological data--including heart rate variability (HRV), electrodermal activity (EDA), and accelerometer-derived movement features. Psychological states were concurrently assessed using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), yielding 247 observations with a total of 4,446 self-reported labels across 18 psychological states related to positive and negative affect, self-esteem, sense of meaning in life, and personal relationships. Machine learning models--including Random Forest, Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and Transformers--were trained to predict these EMA-reported psychological states. Explainable AI techniques (SHAP and LIME) identified physiological markers of importance, while conformal prediction methods assessed model uncertainty. Results indicate that absolute prediction accuracy remains challenging; however, CNN models achieved threshold accuracies of up to 62%, with accelerometer-based features emerging as most predictive. Self-esteem-related states demonstrated the clearest physiological signatures, and among negative affect states, anger was more reliably detectable than anxiety or sadness. These findings highlight the potential of wearable-derived biomarkers for monitoring positive psychological states, despite current limitations in predictive accuracy. Future research should focus on refining feature extraction methods, enhancing model generalizability, and integrating multimodal data sources to improve real-world applicability in mental health monitoring.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Measuring Repositioning in Home Care for Pressure Injury Prevention and Management 96%
- Statistical and machine learning models for classification of human wear and delivery days in accelerometry data 95%
- Comparison of wearable and clinical devices for acquisition of peripheral nervous system signals 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 95%
- Evaluating and mitigating unfairness in multimodal remote mental health assessments 94%
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Off-body Sleep Analysis for Predicting Adverse Behavior in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder 94%
- Evaluating Explanations from AI Algorithms for Clinical Decision-Making: A Social Science-based Approach 94%
- Deep Sentiment Classification and Topic Discovery on Novel Coronavirus or COVID-19 Online Discussions: NLP Using LSTM Recurrent Neural Network Approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Empirical Sample Size Determination for Popular Classification Algorithms in Clinical Research 94%
- Using Automated-Machine Learning to Predict COVID-19 Patient Survival: Identify Influential Biomarkers 92%
- Quantified Flu: an individual-centered approach to gaining sickness-related insights from wearable data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.