Back

Improving Targeting Specificity of Transcranial Focused Ultrasound in Humans Using a Random Array Transducer: A k-Wave Simulation Study

Li, Z.; Yu, K.; Kosnoff, J.; He, B.

2025-05-09 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.04.25.650630 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) has emerged as a promising non-invasive modality for precision neuromodulation. However, the heterogeneous acoustic properties of the skull often induce phase aberrations that shift the ultrasound focus and compromise energy delivery. In this study, we developed and validated a phase-reversal based aberration correction method to enhance the targeting specificity of tFUS using a 128-element random array ultrasound transducer. Individual head models were constructed from T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images and corresponding pseudo-computed tomography (pCT) data to accurately represent subject-specific skull geometries and the targeted left V5 (V5L) region. Acoustic simulations were conducted with the k-Wave toolbox by first acquiring free-field pressure waveforms and then recording the aberrated waveforms in the presence of the skull. The phase differences between these conditions were used to compute corrective delays for each transducer element. Quantitative evaluation using metrics such as focal overlap with the target region, axial focal positioning, and the delivered ultrasound energy demonstrated significant improvements: the overlap volume increased by 98.70%, mean axial positioning errors were reduced by up to 14.36%, and energy delivery to the target improved by 17.58%. We further demonstrated that the proposed approach outperforms the conventional ray-tracing methods. The results show that phase-reversal based aberration correction markedly increases the spatial targeting accuracy of tFUS and enhances the efficiency of focused ultrasound energy deposition for the customized random array transducer, paving a way for effective and personalized non-invasive neuromodulation therapies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.0%
2
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.2%
3
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
6
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
7
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
9
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
11
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
20
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%