Federated Learning for Multi-Disease Ophthalmic Diagnostics using OCTA
Nabil, A. S.; Gholami, S.; Leng, T.; Lim, J. I.; ALAM, M. N.
Show abstract
Federated learning enables collaborative model training across multiple institutions while preserving patient data privacy. This study evaluates five different aggregation strategies (FedAvg, FedAdagrad, FedYogi, FedProx, and FedMRI) for federated learning in the context of multi-disease retinal disease classification using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). We tested these approaches on a diverse dataset combining public OCTA-500 and private data provided by the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC) across seven distinct retinal pathologies, comparing performance against centralized and standalone models in three experimental scenarios of varying class complexity. Our results demonstrate that federated approaches can match or even exceed centralized training performance, with FedMRI achieving 60.87% accuracy in the comprehensive seven-class scenario and all three primary federated methods (FedAvg, FedProx, FedMRI) outperforming centralized training in simplified class scenarios (72.09% vs 69.77%). We observed that different aggregation strategies excel in different performance metrics--FedMRI consistently demonstrated superior ROC-AUC performance while FedAvg showed stronger F1-scores, suggesting better class balance management. These findings provide practical insights for implementing privacy-preserving collaborative AI systems in OCTA-based ophthalmic diagnostics.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 97%
- Assessing generalizability of an AI-based visual test for cervical cancer screening 95%
- Enhancing Fairness in Disease Prediction by Optimizing Multiple Domain Adversarial Networks 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Validation of Saliency Maps for Understanding Deep Neural Networks in Ophthalmology 94%
- STAMP: Simultaneous Training and Model Pruning for Low Data Regimes in Medical Image Segmentation 94%
- Spatial Transcriptomics Expression Prediction from Histopathology Based on Cross-Modal Mask Reconstruction and Contrastive Learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A human-in-the-loop explanation framework for morphologically transparent AI predictions from whole-slide images 94%
- A Deep Learning Based Smartphone Application for Early Detection of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using Endoscopic Images 93%
- Equity-Enhanced Glaucoma Progression Prediction from OCT with Knowledge Distillation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning models for COVID-19 chest x-ray classification: Preventing shortcut learning using feature disentanglement 95%
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 95%
- Compressive Big Data Analytics: An Ensemble Meta-Algorithm for High-dimensional Multisource Datasets 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interpretable Detection of Epiretinal Membrane from Optical Coherence Tomography with Deep Neural Networks 95%
- Toward Understanding COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Deep-learning-based Approach for Severity Analysis and Monitoring the Disease 94%
- Assisting Scalable Diagnosis Automatically via CT Images in the Combat against COVID-19 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.