Back

Developing a Population Health Management Dashboard for Belgium: a focus group study with mock-up design

Van de Putte, M.; Christiaens, L.; Goetschalckx, L.; Morreel, S.; Verbiest, J. R.; Claeys, M.; Van Olmen, J.; Vaes, B.; Peeters, L. M.

2025-04-26 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2025.04.25.25326410 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe necessary data for delivering targeted population health management (PHM) interventions in Belgium is insufficient and scattered due to limited, non- interoperable data sources. Insights on data availability, user needs, and analysis capabilities should be obtained to develop a Belgian PHM dashboard. We aimed to identify visual, content, and access requirements for a PHM dashboard, and visualize user needs through a mock-up dashboard to enhance quintuple aim. MethodsFive focus groups were conducted in three Belgian locoregional health networks (collaborations of primary care zones), comprising 35 potential future dashboard users with various backgrounds. Insights were gathered using open-ended questions based on frameworks of successful international examples. These insights were incorporated into a mock-up dashboard. Subsequently, the mock-up dashboard was discussed in a second round of focus groups. Data from the focus groups were analysed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL) method. ResultsDifferentiated user requirements can be classified into: (1) General Exploration allowing for assessing the health and socioeconomic status and risk factors in a region using PHM indicators, (2) Risk Stratification and Selection of Interventions enabling matching of resources and interventions to at-risk subpopulations, (3) Research Community providing advanced tools for data exploration and collaboration with the research community. The mock-up dashboard meets these requirements according to respondents, by supporting population health managers, healthcare professionals and policymakers with easy access to insights and expert population health managers, such as researchers and data analysts, with options for advanced data analysis. ConclusionsOur study identified exploration, risk stratification, intervention selection and advanced data analysis as key components of an interoperable and customizable dashboard, contributing to a more efficient and equitable healthcare system. The developed PHM mock-up dashboard encapsulates these features, aiming to achieve the quintuple aim in Belgium.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.5%
4
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
19
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
28
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
29
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%