Back

Accurate, cost-effective, and a rapid turnaround of four hours for complicated UTI diagnosis using metagenomics

Bellankimath, A. B.; Branders, S.; Kegel, I.; Ali, J.; Asadi, F.; Johansen, T. E. B.; Imirzalioglu, C.; Hain, T.; Wagenlehner, F.; Ahmad, R.

2025-04-25 urology
10.1101/2025.04.24.25326310 medRxiv
Show abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) affect 405 million people worldwide. Current diagnostics for UTIs rely on cultures, which can take 2 to 4 days. This study evaluated eleven culture independent methods for sample preparation from 77 complicated UTI patient samples, followed by real-time nanopore sequencing and data analysis. The metagenomic results were highly consistent with culture-based clinical routines. The optimized in-house method demonstrated a mean accuracy score of 99% for pathogen identification and 90% for antimicrobial susceptibility profiling. The methods robustness is highlighted by accurately identifying the pathogen with as few as 33 bacterial cells/{micro}L and a low bacterial-to-leukocyte ratio limit of 0.04. Additionally, mNGS identified 13 pathogens that routine diagnostics missed, which were subsequently confirmed by Vivalytic or PCR. This method is up to 30% cheaper than published studies and commercial kits. AUROC analysis indicated that DNA yield and flow cytometry can be used for pre-screening to reduce costs, which is crucial for clinical adoption. This research highlights the rapid diagnosis of UTIs in clinical settings using a cost-effective and scalable method that requires four hours from sample collection to informed decision making. Furthermore, it aims to improve antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship by reducing empirical treatment and ensuring more judicious antibiotic use.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.8%
2
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.9%
3
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.7%
6
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
10
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
11
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
24
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%