Back

On the edge of extinction: Delayed plant genetic response to forest edge dynamics

Hostens, L.; Metsu, C.; Van Acker, K.; Peeters, G.; de Beer, S.; Gansemans, Y.; Kupcinskiene, E.; Jociene, L.; Krokaite-Kudakiene, E.; Paulssen, J.; Mazalla, L.; Diekmann, M.; Conradi, T.; Plössner, S.; Deak, B.; Valko, O.; Fekete, R.; Orczewska, A.; Hedwall, P.-O.; Brunet, J.; Huang, S.; Feigs, J. T.; Naaf, T.; Wulf, M.; Plue, J.; Liira, J.; Deforce, D.; Van Nieuwerburgh, F.; De Frenne, P.; Vandelook, F.; Van Meerbeek, K.; Honnay, O.; De Kort, H.

2025-04-29 ecology
10.1101/2025.04.23.649530 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding genetic responses to forest dynamics is essential for predicting the long-term viability of understory plant populations and for developing effective conservation strategies. This study investigates genetic extinction debt and colonization credit in Circaea lutetiana, a clonal forest understory species, across its European range. Using pooled genotype-by-sequencing data from 40 forest edge and core populations, we examined to what extent population size, latitude and historical changes in forest configuration predict genetic diversity. Our findings reveal that the historical forest configuration profoundly shapes present-day genetic diversity. Long-established forest edge populations exhibit significantly reduced allelic richness (-9%) compared to core populations, indicating the partial pay-off of a genetic extinction debt. In contrast, populations from recently established forest edges maintain comparable allelic richness to core populations, suggesting delayed population genetic responses to land use changes. Finally, populations established in areas that were afforested during the past 250 years exhibit lower genetic diversity than historical forest core populations, indicating a delay in genetic recovery and thus a potential genetic colonization credit. Our results highlight that C. lutetiana populations are not at equilibrium with the current forest configuration, underscoring the role of lagged genetic responses across very long time scales. Connectivity and population size further moderate genetic diversity, with smaller, isolated populations particularly vulnerable to genetic erosion. Given the limited research on delayed evolution in forest understory species, our results improve the understanding of extinction risk dynamics and underscore the need for history-informed restoration efforts.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
2
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
17.5%
3
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.9%
5
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
7
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
9
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
10
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
11
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
12
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
13
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
14
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
15
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
22
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%