The potential impact of reductions in international donor funding on tuberculosis in low- and middle-income countries
Clark, R. A.; McQuaid, C. F.; Richards, A. S.; Bakker, R.; Sumner, T.; Prys-Jones, T. O.; Houben, R. M. G. J.; White, R. G.; Horton, K. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundTuberculosis services in many settings rely heavily on international donor funding. In 2025, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) was dismantled, and other countries also announced cuts to overseas development assistance. We quantified potential epidemiological impacts attributable to these reductions in international donor funding. MethodsWe calibrated a deterministic tuberculosis model to epidemiological indicators in low- and middle-income countries. We projected three future scenarios assuming: a) levels of funding in 2024 continue through 2035, b) termination of USAID funding from 2025, and c) additional reductions in funding through The Global Fund in line with current donor announcements from 2025. We assumed a reduction in tuberculosis treatment initiation rates proportional to budget reductions for each scenario, estimating cumulative excess incident episodes of symptomatic tuberculosis and tuberculosis deaths. FindingsWe modelled 79 countries, representing 91% of global tuberculosis incidence and 90% of global tuberculosis mortality in 2023. Our modelling suggested that the termination of USAID funding may lead to 420 500 excess tuberculosis deaths by 2035. Further reductions in funding in line with current announcements by the United States, France, the United Kingdom, and Germany may lead to an additional 699 200, 63 100, 50 500, and 30 500 TB deaths, respectively. Impacts would be greatest in low-income countries. InterpretationWe estimate substantial potential impacts on tuberculosis morbidity and mortality due to reductions in international donor funding. Expanded support from domestic and international donors is essential to address immediate gaps in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. FundingThis work was unfunded.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the epidemiological and economic impact of digital adherence technologies with differentiated care for tuberculosis treatment in Ethiopia 93%
- Health spending and vaccination coverage in low-income countries 92%
- COVID-19 Mortality in Women and Men in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Cross Sectional Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The natural history of TB disease-a synthesis of data to quantify progression and regression across the spectrum 93%
- Cost-effectiveness of public health strategies for COVID-19 epidemic control in South Africa: a microsimulation modelling study 93%
- Global state of deworming coverage and inequity in low-income and middle-income countries: a spatiotemporal study of household health surveys 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential impact of reduced international donor funding on the household economic burden of tuberculosis in low- and middle-income countries 97%
- The potential impact of novel tuberculosis vaccine introduction on economic growth in low- and middle-income countries 96%
- Urban and rural prevalence of tuberculosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- What does the COVID-19 pandemic mean for the next decade of onchocerciasis control and elimination? 92%
- Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on eliminating trachoma as a public health problem 92%
- Predicting the impact of disruptions in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to the outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and possible mitigation strategies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Deadly Equation: The Global Toll of US TB Funding Cuts 98%
- Potential impact, costs, and benefits of population-wide screening interventions for tuberculosis in Viet Nam: a mathematical modelling study 95%
- Prioritizing countries for TB vaccine readiness research using a global stakeholder-centric approach 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.