PURE-MRI: An International Study Assessing Physician Accuracy in Delineating the Prostate and Urethra on Prostate MRI
Nguyen, L.; Song, Y.; Dornisch, A.; Baxter, M. T.; Barrett, T.; Dale, A. M.; Harisinghani, M.; Kamran, S. C.; Liss, M. A.; Dess, R. T.; Margolis, D. J.; Weinberg, E. P.; Seibert, T. M.
Show abstract
PurposePrecise delineation of genitourinary structures during prostate cancer (PCa) care is critical to optimize treatment delivery while minimizing toxicity and injury. The Prostate and UREthra on MRI (PURE-MRI) study was an international, prospective study to assess physicians accuracy segmenting prostate and urethra on MRI. MethodsPhysicians who diagnose or treat PCa were invited to contour prostate and urethra on patient cases using standard T2-weighted MRI (all planes). We compared these contours to reference consensus segmentations produced by a multidisciplinary panel of experts. We also evaluated performance of a validated prostate auto- segmentation AI tool. Accuracy was assessed with spatial and volumetric analyses. Mixed effects model was used to evaluate potential factors influencing contour performance. Results62 specialists from 11 countries created 114 prostate and 110 urethra contours. Prostate median (min, max) Dice score was 0.92 (0.62, 0.95) for physicians. There was no clear effect of clinical experience or focus. Maximum deviation inside (under-segmentation), maximum deviation beyond expert contour, and mean deviation (per case) from the reference prostate were 3.4 mm (1.0, 12.4), 5.3 mm (2.4, 17.3), and 1.6 mm (0.9, 3.9), respectively. In comparison, prostate auto-segmentation tool results were 0.95 (0.94, 0.96), 3.0 mm, 3.9 mm (3.1, 4.9), and 1.2 mm (1.1, 1.6), respectively. Physician performance was considerably worse for urethra, with Dice score of 0.33 (0.03, 0.69). No urethra AI tool was tested. ConclusionPhysicians contour the prostate on MRI with overall Dice score >0.9, though contours typically had errors >5 mm and sometimes >10 mm. These patterns were observed regardless of clinical experience, specialty, or clinical focus. AI tool performs well enough for clinical use, given comparable accuracy to practicing physicians. In contrast, urethra segmentation on MRI is challenging. More training, better imaging, and/or AI tools may be necessary to achieve consistent, accurate results for the urethra.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Impact of Contouring Variability for Prostate Cancer Tumor Boost 95%
- Use of focal radiotherapy boost for prostate cancer and perceived barriers toward its implementation: a survey 95%
- Association Between Artificial Intelligence-Derived Tumor Volume and Oncologic Outcomes for Localized Prostate Cancer Treated with Radiation Therapy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a High-Performance Multiparametric MRI Oropharyngeal Primary Tumor Auto-Segmentation Deep Learning Model and Investigation of Input Channel Effects: Results from a Prospective Imaging Registry 93%
- Re-irradiation to the Prostate using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after initial definitive Radiotherapy – A systematic review and Meta-analysis of recent trials 93%
- Trial protocol: RadTARGET, a multicenter phase II randomized controlled trial evaluating focal radiotherapy boost with de-intensification of dose to non-suspicious prostate in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality Assurance Assessment of Intra-Acquisition Diffusion-Weighted and T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Registration and Contour Propagation for Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 91%
- Necessity and Impact of Specialization of Large Foundation Model for Medical Segmentation Tasks 90%
- PSMA-Hornet: fully-automated, multi-target segmentation of healthy organs in PSMA PET/CT images 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Rectal Tumor Segmentation with Anomaly Fusion Derived from Anatomical Inpainting: A Multicenter Study 91%
- PathProfiler: Automated Quality Assessment of Retrospective Histopathology Whole-Slide Image Cohorts by Artificial Intelligence, A Case Study for Prostate Cancer Research 91%
- Comparison of Radiomic Feature Aggregation Methods for Patients with Multiple Tumors 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive factors for the development of peritumoral brain edema after LINAC-based radiation treatment in patients with intracranial meningioma 90%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 90%
- Image-localized Biopsy Mapping of Brain Tumor Heterogeneity: A Single-Center Study Protocol 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.