Back

Biomarker discovery study design consistent with the Receiver-Operator Characteristic

Ekström, J.; Stoimenov, I.; Akerren Ögren, J.; Sjöblom, T.

2025-04-25 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2025.04.23.25326188
Show abstract

The field of early biomarker discovery is characterized by a lack of consensus on the choice of statistical methodology, which may impede later progress towards clinically useful biomarkers. The Receiver-Operator Characteristic (ROC) is a de facto standard for determining the accuracy of In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) devices. We demonstrate a biomarker discovery study design that achieves endpoint-consistency through use of ROC analysis from study objectives through sample procurement plan, sample size determination, to data analysis. Through simulations, the investigator can be informed on suitable study size to demonstrate an effect superior to the current best clinically used biomarker for the purpose. The study design is illustrated using proteomic data of newly diagnosed cancer cases and concurrent external controls, and statistically significant composite biomarkers are validated using independent data generated using the same proteomic analysis method. Intriguingly, commonly used feature selection methods do not identify the same composite biomarkers from the same data, and their selections show limited overlap with the ROC-based analysis. The proposed approach can facilitate translation of scientific discoveries into regulatory approved biomarker tests fit for use in clinical medicine.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 16%
1.7× avg
2
Advanced Science
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
#1
162× avg
3
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 12%
2.3× avg
4
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 36 published papers
Top 1%
23× avg
5
Sensors
MDPI AG · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.4%
36× avg
6
Cancers
MDPI AG · based on 57 published papers
Top 3%
11× avg
7
Communications Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 63 published papers
#1
18× avg
8
Journal of Personalized Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 17 published papers
Top 0.2%
25× avg
9
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 7%
3.2× avg
10
Environment International
Elsevier BV · based on 22 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
11
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 135 published papers
Top 18%
1.4%
12
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Elsevier BV · based on 37 published papers
Top 4%
5.7× avg
13
Analytical Chemistry
American Chemical Society (ACS) · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
14
iScience
Elsevier BV · based on 74 published papers
Top 6%
3.6× avg
15
Cell Reports Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 49 published papers
Top 4%
4.5× avg
16
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 38%
0.9%
17
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 10 published papers
Top 2%
10× avg
18
Royal Society Open Science
The Royal Society · based on 49 published papers
Top 6%
3.8× avg
19
JMIRx Med
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 29 published papers
Top 6%
3.5× avg
20
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 12%
0.7%
21
Clinical Cancer Research
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) · based on 22 published papers
Top 4%
4.4× avg
22
Nature Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 88 published papers
Top 17%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
Frontiers Media SA · based on 32 published papers
Top 6%
4.1× avg