Back

GOALS: Gene Ontology Analysis with Layered Shells for Enhanced Functional Insight and Visualization

Yue, Z.; Welner, R. S.; Willey, C. D.; Amin, R.; Chen, J. Y.

2025-04-23 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.04.22.650095 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Gene Ontologies (GOs) are standardized descriptions of gene functions in terms of biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components, capturing their Parent-Child relationships in a structured framework and advancing cancer biological modeling to provide consistent and meaningful insights into functional genomics analysis. The conventional GO hierarchical structure is defined by human curation experts, with levels determined by the shortest path to the root term. However, grouping GOs poses challenges due to the uneven distribution of gene members within GO terms and inconsistencies in the level of detail across terms at the same GO level. In this work, we introduce Gene Ontology Analysis using Layered Shells (GOALS), a novel tool that discretizes GOAs into optimal layers. GOALS creates scalable GO layers while maintaining a balanced number of genes across GOs in each layer. Unlike existing tools, the GOALS framework organizes GO terms using a bottom-up approach based on their co-membership network, discretizing GOs to achieve an exponential fit with GOs gene member size. Meanwhile, GOALS reveals clusters or supersets reflecting biological relevance by unsupervised clustering of GOs latent projections. In a case study on mouse natural killer (NK) cell development, GOALS identified distinct GO functional clusters with multi-GO layers to reveal multiple levels of detail from specific to abstract contexts to maximize signal discovery and uncover those signals associations with trajectory divergence. More importantly, GOALS enhances enrichment analysis by introducing additional GO stratification and latent GO map that enables more accurate classification of functional differences. GOALS offers a robust and innovative framework for exploring disordered GO clusters, mining GO activities, and analyzing potential GO-GO interplays. By addressing critical challenges in functional genomics, GOALS provides a powerful tool for advancing our understanding of cell heterogeneity and potentially uncovering actionable insights for therapeutic development.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.9%
2
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.8%
3
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 2%
11.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
5
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
6
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.6%
8
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
10
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
13
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
14
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
15
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
16
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
19
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
21
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.8%
24
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%