Scalable Identification of Clinically Relevant COPD Documents: A Lightweight NLP Model for Large-Scale EHR Datasets
Al-Garadi, M. A.; Davis, S. E.; Matheny, M. E.; Westerman, D.; Conger, A. K.; Richmond, B. W.; Lasko, T. A.; Ricket, I. M.; Paulin, L. M.; Brown, J. R.; Reeves, R. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) has resulted in the generation of large volumes of clinical notes. Learning algorithms and large language models (LLMs) train from these resources but are susceptible to noise--irrelevant or non-informative data from them. This sensitivity can lead to significant challenges, including performance degradation and the generation of inaccurate predictions or "hallucinations." This study addresses a critical challenge in clinical informatics: efficiently filtering millions of documents for relevance before advanced language model processing, particularly in resource-constrained environments. We present a novel framework for determining document relevance in clinical settings, utilizing a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) dataset. MethodsWe developed a novel framework using weak supervision and domain-expert heuristics to generate "silver standard" labels for training data and expert annotated labels (gold stand),creating two datasets to optimize the model during the development phase and subsequent testing phase. Various text representation techniques, including Bag-of-Words, TF-IDF, lightweight document embeddings, compression-based features, and UMLS concept extraction, were evaluated. These representations were used to train Random Forest, XGBoost, and K-Nearest Neighbors classifiers. Models were optimized on a small expert-annotated dataset and evaluated on a held-out test set. ResultsThe combination of lightweight document embedding with a Random Forest classifier demonstrated the best performance, achieving a precision of 0.75, recall of 0.89, and F1-score of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.87) for identifying relevant COPD documents. This significantly outperformed baseline heuristics (precision: 0.70, recall: 0.38, F1-score: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.43-0.56) and other tested methods. ConclusionOur study presents a novel framework for identifying COPD-relevant clinical documents using lightweight embedding and machine learning. This approach effectively filters pertinent documents, enhancing information retrieval precision. The frameworks scalability and minimal annotation needs make it promising for diverse healthcare applications, potentially optimizing clinical outcomes through efficient document selection for data-driven decision support systems.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of Medical Concept Embedding for Feature Engineering in Phenotyping 95%
- A Study of Calibration as a Measurement of Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Biomedical Research 95%
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Annotation of Medication Mentions in Primary Care Visit Conversations 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating large language model workflows in clinical decision support: referral, triage, and diagnosis 95%
- A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation 94%
- Machine Learning Generalizability Across Healthcare Settings: Insights from multi-site COVID-19 screening 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.