Back

Effectiveness of the Ticket to Work program in supporting employment among adults with disabilities

Ho, P.-S.; Chang, J. C.; Parks, R. A.; Coale, K.; Zhao, C.; Jimenez-Silva, R.; Marfeo, E.; Rasch, E.

2025-04-22 public and global health
10.1101/2025.04.22.25325884 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundReturning to work benefits many people with disabilities, as it supports personal financial independence and provides opportunities for greater societal contributions. The U.S. Social Security Administrations Ticket to Work (TTW) program offers expanded support services to help disability beneficiaries achieve financial independence through gainful employment. SSA has continuously sought new ways to identify those who would most benefit from using a Ticket. ObjectiveTo identify factors contributing to TTW participation and assess its impact on benefits forgone for work. MethodsWe conducted a cohort study using SSA administrative data to predict TTW participation and its impact on benefit cessation. The study sample included beneficiaries with a physical or mental residual functional capacity assessment from 2016. We applied a frequentist propensity score matching estimate and a doubly robust Bayesian hierarchical model-based estimate. ResultsThe study included 172,640 beneficiaries (52.7% male, average age 52 years) with a range of qualifying conditions: musculoskeletal disorders (45.04%), mental disorders (29.10%), neurological disorders (9.82%). Both analytic methods yielded consistent results, showing that TTW participation is effective even after controlling for confounding factors. Personal characteristics (e.g., sex, age, education, race/ethnicity), health and functional status (e.g., work cessation due to health issues, need for alternate sitting arrangements, and limitations in understanding and memory) and environmental factors (e.g., region of residence) influenced Ticket participation. ConclusionsOur findings offer valuable insights for identifying potential TTW participants and estimating benefit savings for SSDI/SSI programs. Future research should explore available support services and barriers to access to improve TTW outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.