Label-free quantification in the Crux toolkit
Acquaye, F. L. N. A.; Wen, B.; Grant, C. E.; Noble, W. S.; Kertesz-Farkas, A.
Show abstract
Ultimately, most tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) proteomics experiments aim to not just detect but also quantify the proteins in a given complex sample. Here, we describe an extension to the Crux MS/MS analysis toolkit to enable label-free quantification of peptides. We demonstrate that Cruxs new quantification command, which is modeled after the algorithms implemented in the widely used FlashLFQ software, is both efficient and accurate. In particular, we achieve a 1.9-fold speedup while reducing the memory usage by 26%. The new crux-lfq command is available in Crux v4.3.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Crux toolkit for analysis of bottom-up tandem mass spectrometry proteomics data 98%
- Extremely fast and accurate open modification spectral library searching of high-resolution mass spectra using feature hashing and graphics processing units 97%
- Fast and memory efficient searching of large-scale mass spectrometry data using Tide 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- AlphaMap: An open-source Python package for the visual annotation of proteomics data with sequence specific knowledge 97%
- Mistle: bringing spectral library predictions to metaproteomics with an efficient search index 96%
- Missing values are informative in label-free shotgun proteomics data: estimating the detection probability curve 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- DrawAlignR: An interactive tool for across run chromatogram alignment visualization 97%
- Benchmarking accuracy and precision of intensity-based absolute quantification of protein abundances in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 97%
- MMS2plot: an R package for visualizing multiple MS/MS spectra for groups of modified and non-modified peptides 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.