DESeq2-MultiBatch: Batch Correction for Multi-Factorial RNA-seq Experiments
Roy, J.; Monthony, A. S.; Torkamaneh, D.
Show abstract
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) experiments frequently encounter batch effects that can significantly distort biological interpretations, particularly in complex, multifactorial studies where biological variables interact with experimental batch conditions. Existing batch correction tools primarily address technical variability and often neglect these critical interaction effects, resulting in incomplete adjustments. To address this gap, we introduce DESeq2-MultiBatch, a novel, lightweight batch correction method implemented entirely within the DESeq2 analytical framework. Unlike conventional approaches, DESeq2-MultiBatch directly leverages DESeq2s internal model estimates to correct raw gene count data, accurately adjusting for experimental batch effects, including interactions with biological variables. Here, we demonstrate that DESeq2-MultiBatch effectively mitigates batch-related variability while preserving genuine biological differences. Benchmarking against widely used methods highlights DESeq2-MultiBatch as a robust, practical solution for improving exploratory data visualization and downstream analyses in multifactorial RNA-seq studies. Availability and implementationhttps://github.com/julienroyulaval/DESeq2-MultiBatch Contactjulien.roy.10@ulaval.ca Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptome assembly from long-read RNA-seq alignments with StringTie2 94%
- Enhancing transcriptome expression quantification through accurate assignment of long RNA sequencing reads with TranSigner 93%
- Robust normalization and transformation techniques for constructing gene coexpression networks from RNA-seq data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dirichlet-multinomial modelling outperforms alternatives for analysis of microbiome and other ecological count data 92%
- On the causes, consequences, and avoidance of PCR duplicates: towards a theory of library complexity 92%
- On the impact of contaminants on the accuracy of genome skimming and the effectiveness of exclusion read filters 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.