Genomics of freshwater adaptation in three-spine stickleback from eastern Canada
Garcia-Elfring, A.; Salamon, M.; Paccard, A.; Barrett, R. D. H.
Show abstract
The threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) is a key model in evolutionary genetics, particularly for studies of parallel evolution, yet most genomic insights derive from populations on the west coast of North America and in Europe. Here, we use restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) of pooled samples to examine genomic differentiation between marine and freshwater stickleback populations from Atlantic Canada. Our analyses reveal substantial heterogeneity in the extent and genomic distribution of marine-freshwater differentiation, with some freshwater populations showing strong divergence consistent with long-term isolation and drift, and others exhibiting patterns consistent with ongoing gene flow and admixture. Despite this demographic variation, we identify genomic regions that are repeatedly differentiated between marine and freshwater habitats, including loci near dopamine receptor genes (Drd4a and Drd2l). Gene ontology analyses of candidate regions show enrichment for functions related to nervous system development and dopamine receptor activity. Together, these results indicate that freshwater-associated genomic differentiation in Atlantic Canadian stickleback occurs across contrasting demographic contexts and suggest a potential role for neurological and behavioural pathways in adaptation to freshwater environments. Significance statementThreespine stickleback are a model system for studying parallel evolution, yet most genomic research has focused on Pacific and European populations. By examining previously understudied Atlantic Canadian populations, we identify genomic patterns consistent with parallel divergence across markedly heterogeneous demographic contexts, including populations shaped by strong drift as well as gene flow. We detect differentiation near dopamine receptor genes, pointing to a potential role for behavioural and hormonal pathways. Together, these results highlight the role of demographic context in shaping patterns of genomic differentiation associated with freshwater colonization.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using seasonal genomic changes to understand historical adaptation: parallel selection on stickleback in highly-variable estuaries 98%
- Gene flow influences the genomic architecture of local adaptation in six riverine fish species 97%
- Long distance migration is a major factor driving local adaptation at continental scale in Coho Salmon 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- The genomic landscape of divergence across the speciation continuum in island-colonising silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis) 96%
- Patterns of linkage disequilibrium reveal genome architecture in chum salmon 95%
- Genomic prediction of growth in a commercially, recreationally, and culturally important marine resource, the Australian snapper (Chrysophrys auratus) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population structure and genomic evidence for local adaptation to freshwater and marine environments in anadromous Arctic Char (Salvelinus alpinus) throughout Nunavik, Quebec, Canada 98%
- Seascape genomics reveals limited dispersal and suggest spatially varying selection among European populations of sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) 96%
- Defining conservation units in a highly diverse species: A case on Arctic charr 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Revealing the evolutionary history and contemporary population structure of Pacific salmon in the Fraser River through genome resequencing 96%
- Large effect life-history genomic regions are associated with functional morphological traits in Atlantic salmon 94%
- Genome Sequence of a Marine Threespine Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from Rabbit Slough in the Cook Inlet 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.