Genome-Wide Assessment of Pleiotropy Across >1000 Traits from Global Biobanks
Levin, M. G.; Koyama, S.; Woerner, J.; Zhang, D. Y.; Rodriguez, A.; Nandi, T.; Truong, B.; Abramowitz, S. A.; Gupta, H.; Kamineni, H.; Hornsby, W.; Li, Z.; Cohron, T.; Huffman, J. E.; Ellinor, P.; Kim, D.; Liao, K. P.; Madduri, R. K.; Voight, B. F.; Verma, A.; Damrauer, S. M.; Natarajan, P.
Show abstract
Large-scale genetic association studies have identified thousands of trait-associated risk loci, establishing the polygenic basis for common complex traits and diseases. Although prior studies suggest that many trait-associated loci are pleiotropic, the extent to which this pleiotropy reflects shared causal variants or confounding by linkage disequilibrium remains poorly characterized. To define a set of candidate loci with potentially pleiotropic associations, we performed genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analyses of up to 1,167 clinically relevant traits and diseases across 1,789,365 diverse individuals genetically similar to Admixed American (AMR, NMax = 60,756), African (AFR, NMax = 128,361), East Asian (EAS, NMax = 307,465), European (EUR, NMax = 1,283,907), and South Asian (SAS, NMax = 8,876) reference populations from the VA Million Veteran Program (MVP), UK Biobank (UKB), FinnGen, Biobank Japan (BBJ), Tohoku Medical Megabank (ToMMo), and Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES). We identified 27,193 genome-wide significant locus-trait pairs (1MB region with PGWAMA < 5 x 10-8) in within-population analysis and 29,139 in multi-population analysis (PMR-MEGA < 5 x 10-8). Among these, 11.5% (n = 3,149) of locus-trait pairs in population-wise and 6.4% (n = 1,875) in multi-population analyses did not reach genome-wide significance in previously published GWAS. In aggregate, the genome-wide significant loci fell within 2,624 non-overlapping autosomal genomic windows on average [~]600kb in size. Each locus contained genome-wide significant signals for a median of 6 traits (IQR 2 to 18), including 2,110 (80%) pleiotropic loci associated with >1 trait. Multi-trait colocalization identified 1,902 (72%) loci with high-confidence (posterior probability > 0.9) evidence of a shared causal variant across two or more traits. Variants in pleiotropic loci were significantly enriched for a broad spectrum of functional annotations compared to non-pleiotropic counterparts. Polygenic scores (PGS) developed from these data generally improved prediction compared to existing PGS, and were broadly associated with both primary and pleiotropic phenotypes. These results provide a contemporary map of genetic pleiotropy across the spectrum of human traits/diseases and diverse genetic backgrounds.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large scale genome-wide association study in a Japanese population identified 45 novel susceptibility loci for 22 diseases 97%
- Systematic assessment of regulatory effects of human disease variants in pluripotent cells 96%
- Genome-wide analysis in 756,646 individuals provides first genetic evidence that ACE2 expression influences COVID-19 risk and yields genetic risk scores predictive of severe disease 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits 97%
- Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis Of Body Mass Index Identifies Novel African Ancestry-Specific Risk Allele 97%
- Transferability of genetic loci and polygenic scores for cardiometabolic traits in British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis across Taiwan Biobank, Biobank Japan and UK Biobank identifies hundreds of novel loci for 36 quantitative traits 98%
- Meta-analysis fine-mapping is often miscalibrated at single-variant resolution 97%
- Proteome-wide Mendelian randomization in global biobank meta-analysis reveals multi-ancestry drug targets for common diseases 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.