Assessing the Impact of the Application of PMSI Data on Enrollment Efficiency, Retention, and Therapeutic Area Performance in Clinical Trials
Nama Ravi, S. K.; WALI, A.; Gordejuela, R.; Collins, B.; Llamas, E.; Lampure, A.; Sommerford, N.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThis study evaluates whether the use of Programme de Medicalisation des Systemes dInformation (PMSI) data in France positively impacts clinical trial performance or not. Specifically, we compared enrollment performance and dropout rates across therapy areas between PMSI-supported and non-PMSI supported clinical trials. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using enrollment and dropout data for clinical trials conducted between Jan 2019 and Oct 2024, across multiple therapy areas. Comparative statistics and visualizations were used to assess the difference in enrollment performance and dropout rates between PMSI-supported and non-PMSI supported trials. ResultsPMSI supported trials demonstrated higher median enrollment rates and fewer outliers across several therapy areas, particularly Infectious Diseases, Gastrointestinal and Dermatology. For Cardiovascular and Oncology trials, the median enrollment rates for PMSI supported trials were slightly higher than the non-PMSI supported trials, indicating a smaller impact on trials in these therapy areas. Specifically, PMSI-supported studies showed enrollment rates that were between 5% and 238% higher than non-PMSI-supported studies, depending on the therapy area. Also, the dropout rates were also lower in PMSI supported trials. ConclusionThe application of PMSI data appears to be associated with improved trial performance in terms of enrollment efficiency, fewer outliers, and consistent trial execution particularly in select therapy areas, namely Infectious Diseases, Gastrointestinal and Dermatology. These findings support the strategic use of PMSI data to enhance trial success and patient recruitment in France.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reporting of Retrospective Registration in Clinical Trial Publications 95%
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 93%
- Sunshine on KOL : a retrospective study about financial ties between medical key opinion leaders and pharmaceutical industry in France 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring scalable assessment methods for terminated trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: A cohort analysis of German and Californian trials 95%
- An interactive retrieval system for clinical trial studies with context-dependent protocol elements 95%
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Number of Interventional Clinical Trials Registered per Million Population per Country Worldwide 96%
- Trials that turn from retrospectively registered to prospectively registered: A cohort study of ‘retroactively prospective’ clinical trial registration using history data 94%
- Supporting Reanalysis and Reuse of Clinical Trial Data: A Case Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Standardization of drug names in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: The DiAna dictionary 93%
- Patient-Reported Reasons for Antihypertensive Medication Change: A Quantitative Study Using Social Media 92%
- Large-scale empirical identification of candidate comparators for pharmacoepidemiological studies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Semantic and geographical analysis of Covid-19 trials reveals a fragmented clinical research landscape likely to impair informativeness. 92%
- Jinhua Qinggan Granules for Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients: a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
- Efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide combined with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.