Protocol for a scoping review of the evidence concerning the unique needs and experiences of Orthodox Jewish women and their partners using maternity services in the UK
Meroz, M. R.; Rivas, C.; McCourt, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundOrthodox Jews follow the Jewish law, Halacha, that determines most daily activities and behaviours. Halacha restrictions and insular lifestyle of groups within the Orthodox community, led to cultural barriers when interacting with NHS maternity services in the UK. Aims and objectivesthis protocol describes a scoping review that will aim to explore the needs of Orthodox Jews when interacting with maternity services, their experiences in the UK, to what extend has this topic been studied, and identify any gaps that need further research. Rationalethe literature on this topic is scarce. There is an urgent need to understand the unique needs of these communities in order to make NHS maternity services accessible to all. Methodsthe scoping review will follow Arksey and OMalleys framework for scoping reviews. We will utilise a broad search strategy that will include terms such as Orthodox Jewish, Haredi, Halacha, Needs, Experiences and Maternity Services. We will search the grey literature and databases such as OpenGrey, PubMed, Web of Science, CINHAL, SocINDEX and ProQuest. The search will be an iterative process that will be led by the search itself and the PPI work done in parallel. Inclusion criteriausing the terms above, we will include English papers from all OECD courtiers, applying no restrictions on publication year. Expected outcomesmapping the literature will allow a better understanding of the needs and experiences of the Orthodox community when interacting with NHS maternity services in the UK and will lead the next stage of the project that aims to make these services more culturally sensitive. This project is part of the main authors NIHR (National Institute for Health and care Research) fellowship.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternity care professionals’ preparedness for and experiences of screening and responding to disclosures of domestic violence in the peripartum period: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis 97%
- Making maternity and neonatal care personalised in the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Babies Born Better Survey in the UK and the Netherlands 96%
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping factors that may influence attrition and retention of midwives: a scoping review protocol 96%
- Cohort Profile: Born in Wales - a birth cohort with maternity, parental, and child data linkage for life course research in Wales, UK 95%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 96%
- Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19 94%
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Family-centered postnatal training and adherence to newborn care practices in district hospitals in two Indian states: A quasi-experimental intervention study 95%
- A mixed methods study of attitudes on location of gynaecological oncology outpatient care: a patient and healthcare professional questionnaire 93%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study investigating the acceptability of cervical screening and self-sampling in postnatal women at 6-week postnatal check-up 94%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 92%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.