Factors Influencing Emerald Ash Borer Ecological Interactions
Borsato, N. D.; McFarlane, E.; Garrett, N.; Biganzoli-Rangel, A.; Marquina, D.; Steinke, D. R.; Floyd, R.; Clare, E.
Show abstract
Emerald ash borer beetles (Agrilus planipennis) in North America are a destructive invasive species that increase tree mortality continent-wide, resulting in major ecological and economic impacts. Trees that are infested experience mortality rates which can exceed 99%, disrupting ecological communities and threatening the $218 billion forestry industry in North America. Given the ecological and economic impact of these pests, we seek to identify biological interactions and gain a better understanding of what ecological factors might influence these relationships. We use DNA metabarcoding from multiple markers to analyze the fungal, parasitic, plant, and microbial interactions of these beetles, and assess the relative importance of life stage (e.g., larvae, pupae, and adults), collection location, habitat, and date on the detection of ecological interactions. We detected 30 different taxonomic orders including 29 order-level interactions in larva1-stage individuals (3 animal, 17 bacteria, and 9 fungi), 64 in larva2-stage individuals (8 animal, 24 bacteria, and 32 fungi), 10 in larva3-stage individuals (2 animal, 3 bacteria, and 5 fungi), 74 in the pupae (5 animal, 31 bacteria, and 38 fungi), and 82 in the adult beetles (4 animal, 48 bacteria, 29 fungi, and 1 parasitic alveolate). These detections include several likely agents of biocontrol including the known commercially available Beauveria fungus, and several potential parasites including Wolbachia and ichneumonid wasps. A random forest model suggests the detection of interactions is best predicted by collection date and life stage, with interactions more likely to be detected in pupal samples which may be the ideal target for future analysis, where cost and time constraints prevent the more thorough analysis of all life stages.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Population-specific effect of Wolbachia on the cost of fungal infection in spider mites 92%
- DNA metabarcoding successfully quantifies relative abundances of arthropod taxa in songbird diets: a validation study using camera-recorded diets 92%
- Differential phoretic host use among sympatric Caenorhabditis nematodes and an association with invasive nitidulid beetles in southwestern Germany 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel eDNA approaches to monitor Western honey bee (Apis mellifera) microbial and arthropod communities 95%
- On the Origin of Feces: Fungal diversity, distribution, and conservation implications from feces of small mammals 94%
- BeeDNA: microfluidic environmental DNA metabarcoding as a tool for connecting plant and pollinator communities 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabarcoding and ecological interaction networks for selecting candidate biological control agents 95%
- Reducing environmentally mediated transmission to moderate impacts of an emerging wildlife disease 94%
- Evaluating the ecological impacts of pesticide seed treatments on arthropod communities in a grain crop rotation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longer study length, standardized sampling techniques, and broader geographic scope leads to higher likelihood of detecting stable abundance patterns in long term black-legged tick studies 93%
- The effect of ethanol concentration on the morphological and molecular preservation of insects for biodiversity studies 93%
- Effectiveness of antifungal treatments during chytridiomycosis epizootics in populations of an endangered frog 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Insect-habitat-plant interaction networks provide guidelines to mitigate the risk of transmission of Xylella fastidiosa to grapevine in Southern France 94%
- Season-long infection of diverse hosts by the entomopathogenic fungus Batkoa major 93%
- Megabarcoding dark taxa - Assessing the utility of mass DNA barcoding for phorid fly species discovery 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.