Back

Viability Differentiation Improves the Diagnostic Potential of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing in Ready-to-Eat Meat Manufacturing

Brown, J. A.; Ricke, S. C.

2025-04-16 microbiology
10.1101/2025.04.16.649186 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Molecular-based microbiological approaches have become valuable tools for the food industry. However, even the most advanced molecular techniques are limited in their ability to differentiate based on viability creating the potential for biased results when applied to the food industry. The objective of this study was to generate a viable microbial bio-map of a commercial ready-to-eat (RTE) meat manufacturing process and assess its utility as a diagnostic tool. Product samples were collected from a commercial RTE meat manufacturing facility at various locations throughout processing. Samples were homogenized and aliquoted for culture-based microbial isolation and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Homogenates were split into pairs and subject to either no treatment (Control) or treated with 25 M PMAxx (PMA) to remove free and non-viable cellular DNA. Overall, PMA treatment resulted in a less rich microbial community compared to Control samples. Paired analysis revealed that the impact of PMA varied by location with the greatest effects being observed at the beginning and end of manufacturing. Both Control and PMA treated samples identified a shift in the microbial population after thermal processing; however, only PMA treated samples identified a secondary shift in the microbial population occurring after slicing. Taxonomic analysis identified Lactobacillus as a predominant genera in sliced and packaged products. These results were further confirmed by the identification of Lactobacillus sakei on packaged product using a culture-based approach. These results suggest PMA treatment provides a higher level of sequencing resolution by removing background DNA. ImportanceMicrobial bio-mapping is a valuable tool for the meat and poultry industry to assess process control and evaluate the efficacy of intervention systems. In recent years it has become more common to incorporate the use of molecular techniques, such as qPCR and 16S rRNA, to quantitatively track target pathogens and gain a more holistic understanding of the microbial community throughout processing. One major limitation we face when applying these DNA-based techniques to the food industry is their inability to differentiate between DNA from viable versus non-viable cells, which may result in the false identification of pathogenic or spoilage microorganisms and bias microbiota results. To practically apply this technology in a ready-to-eat meat manufacturing setting, it is crucial to develop and validate strategies that are capable of differentiating between viable and non-viable cellular DNA.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
3
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
7
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
9
Poultry Science
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
10
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
11
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
12
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
13
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
14
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
22
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
26
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%