Back

Inclusion of the right ventricular muscle bundle during interventricular septal measurement improves diagnostic accuracy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Spevack, D. M.; Ranjan, P.; Khachatorian, Y.; Broker, M.; Kim, C. W.; Nevin, K.; Sharma, M.; Malhotra, D.; Naidu, S. S.

2025-04-21 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.04.16.25325977
Show abstract

IntroductionMeasurement of the interventricular septum (IVS) is a key diagnostic and prognostic parameter in the evaluation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Right ventricular muscle bundles (RVMB) that parallel the IVS complicate septal measurement on both echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Current guideline statements reference left ventricular wall thickness measurements more than 15 mm as part of the diagnostic criteria for HCM. The medical literature lacks published data on the impact of including RVMB as part of the IVS measurement and its influence on diagnostic accuracy for HCM. MethodsWe measured the IVS and RVMB separately on echocardiography in 97 consecutive subjects referred for both echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as part of the initial evaluation for HCM. Subjects were categorized as having or not having HCM based on current practice guidelines. Patients with HCM were sub-categorized as having septal involvement (HCM-Sep) or primarily apical hypertrophy (HCM-Ap). This was done because subjects with obvious HCM-Ap could be diagnosed with HCM irrespective of IVS thickness. ResultsCompared to subjects who did not have HCM, those with HCM-Sep had both increased IVS (15.4 {+/-} 2.7 vs 9.8 {+/-} 1.9 mm, p<0.001) and RVMB thickness (5.2 {+/-} 3.1 vs 1.9 {+/-} 1.9 mm, p<0.001). Within the group of subjects that either had HCM-Sep or did not have HCM, inclusion of the RVMB in the septal measurement increased the sensitivity for HCM from 63% to 100%, whereas specificity decreased from 100% to 87%. RVMB thickness more than 5 mm was seen in 46% of subjects with HCM-Sep but was absent in all subjects with HCM-Ap and those without HCM. The RVMB was visible on long axis imaging in 55% of subjects without HCM, 75% of subjects with HCM-Ap and 85% of subjects with HCM-Sep. ConclusionsInclusion of the RVMB in the measurement of IVS thickness on echocardiography may improve overall diagnostic accuracy for HCM. In addition, RVMB thickness is increased and is more often visible on parasternal long axis imaging in subjects with HCM, consistent with being part of the HCM pathology. This is particularly true in those with HCM-Sep. These data have implications for standardization of echocardiographic and MRI reporting in HCM.

Matching journals

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 0.4%
49× avg
2
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
#1
74× avg
3
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 10%
2.5× avg
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 2%
17× avg
5
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
#1
75× avg
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 5%
6.7× avg
7
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.6%
31× avg
8
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.3%
70× avg
9
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.7%
44× avg
10
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 2%
14× avg
11
Heart Rhythm
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
12
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 85%
2.4%
13
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
14
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 1%
26× avg
15
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
16
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 4%
6.8× avg
17
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
17× avg
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 16%
0.8%
19
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 51%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 13%
0.6%