Back

Spatial Clusters of Caesarean Sections across India - Insights from NFHS Data

Sahoo, D. P.; Agarwal, N.; Soman, B.; Patil, S.; Mitra, A.

2025-04-17 public and global health
10.1101/2025.04.15.25325862 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe rising prevalence of caesarean sections (C-sections) in India, surpassing the World Health Organizations recommended rate of 10-15%, has become a significant public health concern. This study aims to analyze the patterns and spatial clustering of C-sections across Indias states and districts, utilizing data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4 and NFHS-5). MethodsSpatial autocorrelation analysis was applied to summarize the extent to which districts with similar proportions of C-sections tend to occur next to each other, forming spatial clustering. This was done using Global Morans I for the fourth and fifth rounds of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) data conducted in 2015-16 and 2019-21, respectively. LISA cluster maps were produced to test for global spatial autocorrelation, and the Getis-Ord General G statistic was used to test for local clustering ResultsOur research reveals a substantial increase in caesarean deliveries, from 17.2% in NFHS-4 (2015-16) to 21.5% in NFHS-5 (2019-21). This trend is more pronounced in rural areas, challenging previous assumptions about urbanization as a primary driver. We observed marked disparities between public and private healthcare facilities, with private hospitals showing significantly higher rates of caesarean births. Public hospitals exhibited clustering in southern India and parts of northern India, while private facilities showed clustering along the eastern coast and in northeastern regions. Global Morans I and Getis-Ord General G statistics confirmed significant spatial autocorrelation and clustering (p < 0.01) for both public and private facilities. ConclusionThis study highlights the complex interplay of factors influencing caesarean section rates, including healthcare access, institutional policies, and the urban-rural differential. It underscores the need for targeted interventions and policy adjustments to address the disproportionate increase in caesarean deliveries.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.