Pangebin: improving plasmid binning in bacterial isolates using pangenome-assembly graphs.
Sgro, M.; Brejova, B.; Vinar, T.; Priola, Y.; Bonizzoni, P.; Chauve, C.
Show abstract
Short-read genome assemblies typically consist of many contigs of variable lengths and their putative connections represented as an assembly graph. Assembly graphs produced by different tools from the same data may differ significantly, posing a challenge to tools for downstream processing tasks. One such task is plasmid binning, that is identifying plasmids in sequenced bacterial isolates, which is crucial for monitoring the spread of antimicrobial resistance. When plasmid binning tools are applied to assembly graphs produced by different tools, they may exhibit different performance, and choosing the best results a priori can be difficult. To address the above issue, we propose the use of a pangenome graph, built from assembly graphs produced by assembling short reads of the same sample with different assemblers. The resulting pangenome-assembly graph highlights similarities between contigs from different assemblies while retaining information on contigs that appear only in one of the input assemblies. We then used the PlasBin-flow plasmid binning tool customized to take into account pangenome information to identify plasmid bins. The results for pangenome-assemblies built by Unicycler and Skesa show an increase in accuracy measures compared to the mean results obtained on single assemblies, leading to an overall more accurate prediction than a blind choice of assemblers. The source code of the pipeline is available at https://github.com/AlgoLab/pangebin along with the dataset used in this study.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SPAligner: alignment of long diverged molecular sequences to assembly graphs 97%
- AmpliDiff: An Optimized Amplicon Sequencing Approach to Estimating Lineage Abundances in Viral Metagenomes 96%
- Read-SpaM: assembly-free and alignment-free comparison of bacterial genomes with low sequencing coverage 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.