Back

A Benchmarking Platform for Assessing Protein Language Models on Function-related Prediction Tasks

Cevrim, E.; Yigit, M. G.; Ulusoy, E.; Yilmaz, A.; Dogan, T.

2025-04-16 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.04.10.648084 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Proteins play a crucial role in almost all biological processes, serving as the building blocks of life and mediating various cellular functions, from enzymatic reactions to immune responses. Accurate annotation of protein functions is essential for advancing our understanding of biological systems and developing innovative biotechnological applications and therapeutic strategies. To predict protein function, researchers primarily rely on classical homology-based methods, which use evolutionary relationships, and increasingly on machine learning (ML) approaches. Lately, protein language models (PLMs) have gained prominence; these models leverage specialised deep learning architectures to effectively capture intricate relationships between sequence, structure, and function. We recently conducted a comprehensive benchmarking study to evaluate diverse protein representations (i.e., classical approaches and PLMs) and discuss their trade-offs. The current work introduces the Protein Representation Benchmark - PROBE tool, a benchmarking framework designed to evaluate protein representations on function-related prediction tasks. Here, we provide a detailed protocol for running the framework via the GitHub repository and accessing our newly developed user-friendly web service. PROBE encompasses four core tasks: semantic similarity inference, ontology-based function prediction, drug target family classification, and protein-protein binding affinity estimation. We demonstrate PROBEs usage through a new use case evaluating ESM2 and three recent multimodal PLMs--ESM3, ProstT5, and SaProt--highlighting their ability to integrate diverse data types, including sequence and structural information. This study underscores the potential of protein language models in advancing protein function prediction and serves as a valuable tool for both PLM developers and users.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.