Back

Contraceptive views, satisfaction, responsibility, and knowledge: A theater-based study at the Dutch Lowlands festival

Beumer, W. Y.; Sprenger, M.; Eksi, E.; Bartels, C.; van Bohemen, S.; van Ditzhuijzen, J.; Dekker, L. P.; de Haan, I.; Bijma, H. H.; El Marroun, H.; Jansen, P. W.; Enthoven, C.

2025-04-14 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2025.04.10.25325356
Show abstract

ObjectivesHistorically, contraceptive research is impeded by barriers to openly discuss sexual experiences. Theater-based research is a promising approach to foster deeper engagement and a richer exploration of lived experiences to gain insights in underlying implicit factors that shape contraceptive use. This study uses theater-based research to explore adults views, responsibility, satisfaction, and knowledge about contraception. Study DesignThe study was conducted at a three-day music festival in the Netherlands with 1,024 participants (32.9% men, mean age 28.1 years). Theater was integrated by transforming the study setting into a dance club, where the research team performed characters. Participants completed an individual survey prior to the theater experience, a team-based contraceptive knowledge quiz, and a writings on the wall activity. Survey and quiz data were analyzed using linear regression, thematic analysis was applied for evaluating writings on the wall. ResultsOn a scale from 1 to 10, the survey revealed general contraceptive satisfaction (women: 7.0, men: 7.7) and responsibility (women: 8.7, men: 7.7). Participant teams had a mean of 73.7% correct quiz answers. We found six themes that emerged in contraceptive views: side effects, fallibility, shared responsibility, information needs, dismissive counseling, and resistance to hormones. ConclusionThis study revealed complementary findings between traditional survey findings, indicating overall satisfaction with contraception, and theater-based writings on the wall, eliciting more candid and critical reflections with a notably negative tone. Theater-based data collection may capture lived experiences more vividly and lower barriers for research participation, suggesting its value for studying sexual and reproductive health. ImplicationsTheater offers a promising complement to conventional contraception research. By fostering comfort, humor and participation, it reveals more candid perspectives and may therefore reduce social desirability bias. Future research should further examine its added value in recruiting populations not reached by traditional methods.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 15%
1.8× avg
2
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 5%
4.4× avg
3
Health Expectations
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
#1
126× avg
4
Sexually Transmitted Infections
BMJ · based on 20 published papers
Top 0.3%
72× avg
5
PLOS Global Public Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 287 published papers
Top 7%
4.1× avg
6
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 3%
9.0× avg
7
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.8%
25× avg
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 6%
3.9× avg
9
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 59%
2.5%
10
BMC Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 148 published papers
Top 11%
3.1× avg
11
BMJ Global Health
BMJ · based on 95 published papers
Top 7%
3.2× avg
12
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 8%
2.5× avg
13
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 31 published papers
Top 3%
8.0× avg
14
European Journal of Human Genetics
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 25 published papers
Top 2%
16× avg
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 17%
1.6× avg
16
Preventive Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.1%
25× avg
17
Human Reproduction
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
11× avg
18
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
Fortune Journals · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
8.4× avg
19
SSM - Population Health
Elsevier BV · based on 17 published papers
Top 2%
9.7× avg
20
International Journal of Epidemiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 65 published papers
Top 9%
2.2× avg
21
British Journal of General Practice
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 22 published papers
Top 2%
6.7× avg