Protocol for a pragmatic non-randomized controlled study evaluating the efficacy of a dimensional adaptation of GPM (GPM-extended) compared to a classic outpatient GPM treatment for patient fulfilling criteria for BPD: the EPSYLIA project
Blay, M.; Benmakhlouf, I.; Zenou, M.; Amate, M.; Uludag-Martin, A.; Chevrier, F.; Pomey, M.-L.; Brisebarre, M.; Lebourleux, P.; Lopepe, O.; Choi-Kain, L.; Speranza, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundPersonality disorders (PD) are common and debilitating psychiatric conditions, often characterized by severe interpersonal and self-dysfunction. Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is the most studied PD, with treatments like Good Psychiatric Management (GPM) demonstrating effectiveness. To address the current state of the personality disorder field, where most evidence-based treatments have been developed using a categorical approach, while the most empirically supported approach is the dimensional one, we developed an adaptation of GPM (GPM-extended) integrating concepts of dimensional personality dysfunction into an established therapeutic framework. MethodsThis prospective "here-there" study will compare GPM-extended with standard GPM in two outpatient facilities. Participants ([≥]18 years) meeting BPD criteria per the SCID-II will be included. The GPM-extended group incorporates a dimensional diagnostic framework focusing on three personality dilemmas (rejection/abandonment fears, self-esteem dysregulation, and perfection/control issues), with tailored psychoeducation and treatment priorities. The standard GPM group will follow the validated GPM protocol, emphasizing interpersonal hypersensitivity and standard psychoeducation. Both groups will receive weekly individual therapy and group interventions for one year. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of GPM-extended in reducing BPD symptoms after one year. Secondary outcomes include personality functioning, traits, and various clinical dimensions such as impulsivity, emotional regulation, and social functioning. DiscussionThis study seeks to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of integrating dimensionality into GPM, offering a pragmatic pathway to improve PD treatment and bridging gaps between evidence-based conceptualizations and treatments of PD. Clinical trial numberNCT06913738
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Incidence and Predictors of Neuropsychiatric manifestations following a Traumatic Brain Injury in Referral Hospitals in Dodoma, Tanzania: a protocol of a prospective longitudinal observational study 93%
- Influences of race and clinical variables on psychiatric genetic research participation: Results from a schizophrenia sample 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 94%
- Sex-differences in determinants of suicide risk preceding psychiatric admission: An electronic medical record study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Current state of the evidence on community treatments for people with complex emotional needs: a scoping review 94%
- Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions 94%
- Short-term functional outcome in psychotic patients. Results of the Turku Early Psychosis Study (TEPS) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Experiences in Patients with Common Mental Disorders Attending the UK Primary Care Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) Programme 94%
- Multidimensional apathy: A simple and inclusive clinical marker of youth mental health—A longitudinal study 94%
- Validation of the short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire in young adulthood 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting remission after internet-delivered psychotherapy in patients with depression using machine learning and multi-modal data 94%
- Neurovegetative symptom subtypes in young people with major depressive disorder and their structural brain correlates 93%
- Delineating and validating higher-order dimensions of psychopathology in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.