Evaluation of two easy-to-implement digital breathing interventions in the context of daily stress levels in a series of N-of-1 trials: results from the Anti-Stress Intervention Among Physicians (ASIP) Study
Vetter, V. M.; Kurth, T.; Konigorski, S.
Show abstract
Physicians face intense work-related stress, which can harm their health, increase the risk of medical errors, lower healthcare quality, and increase costs within the healthcare system. In this 4-week intervention study, individual-level and population-level effects of two short and easy-to-perform breathing exercises designed to reduce stress are evaluated among 76 physicians in residency in Germany in a series of N-of-1 trials. Levels of stress and levels of stress expected for the following day were assessed electronically every day via the StudyU App. Intervention effects were estimated using Bayesian linear regression models and were overall small on the population level but they showed large heterogeneity between individuals with strong effects for selected individuals. Twenty-seven participants benefitted from the anti-stress exercises. Three (Mindfulness Breathing) and seven participants (box breathing) had a [≥]70% probability for a daily stress reduction of [≥]0.5 points and thereby fulfilled our responder criteria. On average, 4.5 months after completion of the individual N-of-1 trials, a follow-up survey among all participants was conducted to assess sustainability of the interventions. Although general implementation of these anti-stress exercises cannot be recommended, they can be highly effective for selected individuals and potentially beneficial in specific subgroups.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-beneficial belief updating as a coping mechanism for stress-induced negative affect 92%
- Alpha activity neuromodulation induced by individual alpha-based neurofeedback learning in ecological context: A double-blind randomized study 92%
- Comparison of Mental Health Symptom Changes from pre-COVID-19 to COVID-19 by Sex or Gender: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors Associated with Longitudinal Psychological and Physiological Stress in Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- Combining AI and human support in mental health: a digital intervention with comparable effectiveness to human-delivered care 93%
- Multimodal Recruitment for an Internet-Based Pilot Study of Ovulation and Menstruation (OM) Health 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can Psychedelic Use Benefit Meditation Practice? Examining Individual, Psychedelic, and Meditation-Related Factors 92%
- Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention and a health self-management programme on psychological well-being in older adults with subjective cognitive decline: Secondary analyses from the SCD-Well randomised clinical trial 92%
- Probing sustained attention and fatigue across the lifespan 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of easy-to-implement anti-stress interventions in a series of N-of-1 trials: Study protocol of the Anti-Stress Intervention Among Physicians Study (ASIP) 96%
- Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Targeting the Default Mode Network for the Treatment of Depression 91%
- Development of a digitally-obtainable 10-year all-cause mortality risk score based on data from 497,712 UK Biobank participants 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.