Back

PepBERT: Lightweight language models for peptide representation

Du, Z.; Li, Y.

2025-04-14 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.04.08.647838 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein language models (pLMs) have been widely adopted for various protein and peptide-related downstream tasks and demonstrated promising performance. However, short peptides are significantly underrepresented in commonly used pLM training datasets. For example, only 2.8% of sequences in the UniProt Reference Cluster (UniRef) contain fewer than 50 residues, which potentially limits the effectiveness of pLMs for peptide-specific applications. Here, we present PepBERT, a lightweight and efficient peptide language model specifically designed for encoding peptide sequences. Two versions of the model--PepBERT-large (4.9 million parameters) and PepBERT-small (1.86 million parameters)--were pretrained from scratch using four custom peptide datasets and evaluated on nine peptide-related downstream prediction tasks. Both PepBERT models achieved performance superior to or comparable to the benchmark model, ESM-2 with 7.5 million parameters, on 8 out of 9 datasets. Overall, PepBERT provides a compact yet effective solution for generating high-quality peptide representations for downstream applications. By enabling more accurate representation and prediction of bioactive peptides, PepBERT can accelerate the discovery of food-derived bioactive peptides with health-promoting properties, supporting the development of sustainable functional foods and value-added utilization of food processing by-products. The datasets, source codes, pretrained models, and tutorials for the usage of PepBERT are available at https://github.com/dzjxzyd/PepBERT.

Published in Future Foods · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.