Back

Comparative analysis of centromeres of oat (Avena sativa) and its tetraploid and diploid relatives reveals rapid evolution of centromere composition and architecture

Wehrkamp, C. M.; Heuberger, M.; Wicker, T.

2025-04-08 plant biology
10.1101/2025.04.08.647780 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRecent advances in assemblies of nearly gap-free, high-quality genomes have enabled detailed analysis of centromeres in large and highly repetitive crop genomes. Here, we analyse the hexaploid Avena sativa genome and its tetraploid (A. insularis) and diploid relatives (A. longiglumis, A. atlantica and A. eriantha). ResultsAvena centromeres are largely composed of retrotransposons belonging to three families, RLG_Ava, RLG_Cereba and RLG_Beth. Analysis of retrotransposon populations revealed striking differences in the centromere architecture between the A, C and D genome lineages. We identified distinct profiles of transposable element bursts for these lineages which include the emergence and disappearance of retrotransposon families and subfamilies. We identified multiple centromere shifts which occurred in the C genome lineage within the past [~] 4 myrs and retraced species divergences and polyploidization events in the Avena genus. Although the studied species are closely related, our data show that their centromeres have rapidly evolved different and distinct centromere architectures, for example through the spread of novel satellite repeats or activity bursts of different retrotransposon families and subfamilies. Additionally, we found that RLG_Ava and RLG_Cereba retrotransposons have been coexisting while simultaneously competing for the centromeric "niche" since the emergence of the Poaceae (grasses). ConclusionsOur comparative analyses provided detailed insight into centromere evolution across the Avena genus and revealed that composition and architecture of centromeres can vary greatly even between closely related species and different ploidy levels. Our findings emphasize the need for extended analyses of large genome species to improve our understanding of centromere evolution.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.9%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.2%
3
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.4%
4
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
5
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
7
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
9
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
10
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
12
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Mobile DNA
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
16
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
18
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Plant Cell Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
26
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%