Evaluation of person-centred outcome measures for use in clinical trials of tuberculosis therapeutics
Tweed, C. D.; South, A.; Staples, S.; Tsogt, B.; Tukvadze, N.; Turner, R. M.; Dressler, S.; Gray, A. T.; Kumar, B.; Rucsineanu, O.; Sommerfeld, P.; Burgess, R. A.; Esmail, H.
10.1101/2025.04.07.25325380 medRxivShow abstract
BackgroundThere is a need for person-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) in tuberculosis (TB) clinical trials to capture the priorities of affected individuals relating to both disease and treatment, alongside the traditional efficacy and safety analysis. MethodsWe conducted a literature search to identify existing health-related quality-of-life (HR-QoL) measurement tools and instances where they have been used to evaluate TB disease in interventional studies. DR-TB survivors were recruited for focus group discussions in South Africa, Mongolia and Georgia to determine the most important aspects of disease and treatment experience from their perspective. A second round of focus groups then worked to prioritise these items and group them within different domains. A panel of researchers and academic clinicians evaluated existing PCOMs identified in the literature search using a published framework. Finally, an assessment was carried out by a experienced TB Community Advisory Group members for appropriateness and acceptability, and clinical trial site investigators for feasibility of the PCOMs. ResultsThe initial round of 9 focus groups involving 57 participants identified priority items grouped under the fields "overall quality of life", "disease symptoms", and "treatment and side effects". In the second round of four focus groups involving 26 participants, the highest ranked items under "overall quality of life" were duration of treatment, experience of swallowing pills, and how long before being able to contribute to the household. The most important symptoms were coughing, weight loss and breathlessness. The highest ranked side effects were nausea/vomiting, skin colour changes, and nerve problems. FACIT-TB was the only measurement tool assessed that was rated "good" for appropriateness, and "excellent", "good" or "fair" in all other fields by community representatives, researchers and clinical trial site staff. ConclusionsThe FACIT-TB measurement tool was identified as the most appropriate disease-specific PCOM currently available for use in clinical trials investigating novel DR-TB therapeutics.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Treatment for radiographically active, sputum culture-negative pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Adherence trajectory as an on-treatment risk indicator among drug-resistant TB patients in the Philippines 94%
- Outcomes of Isoniazid Preventive Therapy among people living with HIV in Kenya: A retrospective study of routine health care data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tuberculosis services delivery challenges and their mitigations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tanzania: A qualitative study 94%
- Pre-diagnostic loss to follow-up in an active case-finding TB program: a mixed-methods study from rural Bihar, India 94%
- Exploring the Role of Microbiome in Susceptibility, Treatment Response and Outcome among Tuberculosis Patients from Pakistan; Study Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study (Micro-STOP) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Treatment preferences among people at risk of developing tuberculosis: a discrete choice experiment 96%
- Evaluating the health impact, health-system costs and cost-effectiveness of using TrueNat on stool samples compared to usual care for the diagnosis of paediatric tuberculosis in primary care settings: a modelling analysis 94%
- Integrating Isoniazid Preventive Therapy into the Fast-Track HIV Treatment Model in Urban Zambia: A Proof-of -Concept Pilot Project 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Contextual factors influencing implementation of tuberculosis digital adherence technologies: a scoping review guided by the RE-AIM framework 94%
- Availability, scope, and quality of monkeypox clinical management guidelines globally: a systematic review 93%
- Private sector tuberculosis care quality during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeated cross-sectional standardized patients study of adherence to national TB guidelines in urban Nigeria 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Potential Utility of C-reactive Protein for Tuberculosis Risk Stratification among Patients with Non-Meningitic Symptoms at HIV Diagnosis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries 93%
- Adverse events reported during weekly isoniazid-rifapentine (3HP) tuberculosis preventive treatment among people living with HIV in Uganda 92%
- Understanding non-adherence to tuberculosis medications in India using urine drug metabolite testing: a cohort study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.