The Effect of Integrative Reminiscence in Older Adults with Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
Yang, Y.; Li, H.; Khait, A. A.; Shellman, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundDepressive symptoms are the most common comorbid psychiatric symptoms associated with older adults, given the physical, psychological, and emotional turmoil that most people experience. Integrative reminiscence, a type of intervention to combat these symptoms, emphasizes reflecting on ones negative life events, resolving past conflicts, and reconciling the discrepancy between ideal and discovering personal meaning and worth in life. The review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of integrative reminiscence interventions in mitigating depressive symptoms among older adults. MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across four electronic databases: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus. The search encompassed studies published in the English language. The risk of bias in randomized control and quasi-experimental studies was critically evaluated by the Cochrane ROB 2 tool, and the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool, respectively. ResultsA total of nine articles were included in the review. The meta-analysis showed a large and statistically significant effect of integrative reminiscence in reducing depression from post-baseline to baseline (Cohens d = 0.9608; p < .0001). The effects at 3-month follow-up or longer showed a similarly large effect size (Cohens d = 1.3159; p < 0.0001), indicating the effect of integrative reminiscence could be sustained over time for older adults with depressive symptoms. ConclusionThis review demonstrates the significantly large effect of this intervention in alleviating depressive symptoms and provides robust empirical evidence for employing integrative reminiscence to reduce depressive symptoms in older adults.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention and a health self-management programme on psychological well-being in older adults with subjective cognitive decline: Secondary analyses from the SCD-Well randomised clinical trial 95%
- Psychotherapies and Psychological Support for Individuals Facing Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review 95%
- Effectiveness of aerobic physical exercise on depression symptoms in adults: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preventing respiratory illness in older adults aged 60 years and above living in long-term care: A rapid overview of reviews 92%
- Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Prevalence of mental health illness in Nigeria: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Virtual mindfulness interventions to promote well-being in young adults: A mixed-methods systematic review 94%
- Increased neurotoxicity due to activated immune-inflammatory and nitro-oxidative stress pathways in patients with suicide attempts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 91%
- Prevalence and Risk Factors for Acute Posttraumatic Stress Disorder during the COVID-19 Outbreak 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- From smartphone data to clinically relevant predictions: A systematic review of digital phenotyping methods in depression 91%
- Problematic usage of the internet and eating disorders: a multifaceted, systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
- The Effects of Psychosocial Stress on Memory and Cognitive Ability: A Meta-Analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Helping Older People Engage (HOPE) Study: Protocol & COVID Modifications for a Randomized Trial 94%
- A Retrospective Analysis of Serious Adverse Events and Deaths in US-Based Lifestyle Clinical Trials for Cognitive Health 92%
- Erroneous risks in pharmaceutical versus non-pharmaceutical interventions during data extraction in evidence synthesis practice: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.