Back

The Effect of Integrative Reminiscence in Older Adults with Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Yang, Y.; Li, H.; Khait, A. A.; Shellman, J.

2025-04-08 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.04.07.25325360 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDepressive symptoms are the most common comorbid psychiatric symptoms associated with older adults, given the physical, psychological, and emotional turmoil that most people experience. Integrative reminiscence, a type of intervention to combat these symptoms, emphasizes reflecting on ones negative life events, resolving past conflicts, and reconciling the discrepancy between ideal and discovering personal meaning and worth in life. The review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of integrative reminiscence interventions in mitigating depressive symptoms among older adults. MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across four electronic databases: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus. The search encompassed studies published in the English language. The risk of bias in randomized control and quasi-experimental studies was critically evaluated by the Cochrane ROB 2 tool, and the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool, respectively. ResultsA total of nine articles were included in the review. The meta-analysis showed a large and statistically significant effect of integrative reminiscence in reducing depression from post-baseline to baseline (Cohens d = 0.9608; p < .0001). The effects at 3-month follow-up or longer showed a similarly large effect size (Cohens d = 1.3159; p < 0.0001), indicating the effect of integrative reminiscence could be sustained over time for older adults with depressive symptoms. ConclusionThis review demonstrates the significantly large effect of this intervention in alleviating depressive symptoms and provides robust empirical evidence for employing integrative reminiscence to reduce depressive symptoms in older adults.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.