Exploring Sleep Quality in Bangladeshi University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Nurunnabi, M.; Kamruzzaman Khan, M.; Rahim Kaiser, F.; Abbas, M. G.; Tabassum, T. T.; Farha, T.; Akter, F.; Ahmad Tarafdar, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundUniversity students frequently experience challenges that affect their sleep quality, including academic stress, lifestyle habits, and socio-demographic factors. Common sleep disturbances, such as delayed sleep onset and poor sleep efficiency, often result in daytime dysfunction and difficulty maintaining enthusiasm. MethodsThis cross-sectional study appraised sleep quality among undergraduate students in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 530 undergraduate students were purposively selected from three public universities. Participants were chosen through convenience sampling, with students who had contracted COVID-19 during the study excluded from the sample. ResultsThe mean age of the university students was 21.1 ({+/-}2.0) years. Regarding PSQI components, the participants showed moderate sleep latency (55.7%) and habitual sleep efficiency (56.0%), with mild levels of sleep disturbances at night (68.1%), daytime dysfunction (51.1%), and difficulty maintaining enthusiasm (48.5%). The global PSQI scores were poor for 59.4% of participants, while 40.6% had good scores, with a mean of 6.5({+/-}2.9). Among the students, 44.9% reported fair subjective sleep quality, followed by good (24.7%), very good (18.1%), and poor (12.3%) sleep quality. Lifestyle factors such as class attendance, online media usage, BMI, physical exercise, tea/coffee consumption, and smoking were significantly associated with sleep quality (p<0.05). Sleep quality factors like daytime sleep duration, nighttime sleep latency, and sleeping pill usage were also significantly associated with sleep quality (p<0.05). Significant associations were found between sleep quality and factors such as age, household income, daily study hours, BMI, daytime sleep, and sleep latency (p<0.05). ConclusionThe study revealed that longer sleep latency, daytime sleep, and sleeping pill usage were related with poorer sleep quality. It also emphasized that sleep disturbances, daytime dysfunction, and difficulty maintaining enthusiasm were significant predictors of sleep quality.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of medical school on mental health and sleep habits 96%
- Obstructive sleep apnea is highly prevalent in COVID19 moderate to severe ARDS survivors: Findings of level I Polysomnography in a tertiary care hospital 95%
- Correlation analysis of heart rate variations and glucose fluctuations during sleep 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Burnout and sleep problems among nurses working in a tertiary hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal 96%
- Prevalence of Hypertension and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Private and Public Tertiary Hospitals in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania 92%
- Corona virus fear among health workers during the early phase of pandemic response in Nepal: a web-based cross-sectional study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between subjective sleep quality and cognitive performance in healthy young adults: Evidence from three empirical studies 94%
- Is sleep apnea-hypopnea index relevant for impaired brain perfusion and desaturation in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndromes? 94%
- Satisfaction with Life in relation to Sleep Health among a Nationally Representative Sample of U.S. Adults 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Elevated prevalence and treatment of sleep disorders from 2011 to 2020; a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study in Korea 94%
- Risk Factors for Non-Communicable Diseases among Bangladeshi Adults: An Application of Generalized Linear Mixed Model on Multilevel Demographic and Health Survey Data 92%
- Psychiatric Manifestations and Associated Risk Factors among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in Edo State, Nigeria 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.