Back

State AIDS Drug Assistance Programs' Contribution to the United States' Viral Suppression, 2015-2022

McManus, K. A.; Killelea, A.; Rogers, E. Q.; Liu, F.; Horn, T.; Steen, A.; Keim-Malpass, J.; Hamp, A.; Rogawski McQuade, E. T.

2025-04-06 hiv aids
10.1101/2025.04.04.25325288 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundState AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs) provide HIV medication access for people with HIV (PWH) with low incomes in the United States (US). We quantified the proportion of viral suppression (VS) that is from ADAP clients for 2015-2022. MethodsFor 2015-2022, we obtained viral load (VL) test results and VS data from publicly available, jurisdiction-level data on ADAP clients and PWH. We report descriptive statistics including the proportion of PWH with a VL who had VS and were supported by ADAPs. ResultsAfter excluding jurisdictions with missing data, PWH who were included in the analysis for each year was 63.7-96.4%. VS for PWH each year was 60-66.3%. VS for ADAP clients was 81.2%-91.4%. In all years, compared to all PWH, a lower proportion of ADAP clients had a reported VL and a higher proportion had VS. Over 2015-2022, the average proportion of PWH who were ADAP clients was 23.1%, the proportion of PWH with VLs who were ADAP clients was 22.2%, and the proportion of PWH with VS who were ADAP clients was 30.8%. ConclusionsAlmost a third of the entire VS rate was from ADAP clients, despite ADAP serving less than 25% of PWH. A much higher proportion of ADAP clients achieved VS, compared to PWH. ADAPs impact is not due to ADAP clients being over represented among PWH with reported VLs. ADAP does not directly receive any federal Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) Initiative funding. Policymakers should examine how ADAPs can support the EHE Initiative. SummaryDespite state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs) serving less than a quarter of people with HIV, almost a third of the viral suppression in the United States can be attributed to ADAPs. ADAPs are essential for ending the HIV epidemic.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
8
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
12
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
13
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
14
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%