Quality of postnatal care for mothers and neonates in Mexico: insights from the maternal eCohort study
Paredes-Cruz, M.; Perez-Moran, D.; Doubova, S. V.; Arsenault, C.; Quinzanos-Fresnedo, C.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe study aimed to evaluate healthcare use during the postnatal period (PNC) for mothers and their babies, the content of care received, mothers perceived quality of care, and the factors influencing these perceptions. MethodsThe study analyzed postnatal survey from the maternal eCohort conducted at the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), which included 973 women aged 18 to 49 recruited after their first antenatal care visit with a family physician at 48 family medicine clinics in eight states in Mexico. We assessed PNC use, content of care and perceived quality using descriptive analysis. We used Poisson multivariable regression analysis to investigate the factors influencing womens perceptions of higher quality of care during PNC. Results29.4% of women and 12.0% of infants lacked healthcare during the postnatal period. Most women who received PNC attended consultations at IMSS (72.3%), while 17.7% combined IMSS with other providers, and 10% used only private services. Infants received 82.4% of recommended care, compared to 66.7% for mothers. The median perceived quality of care among women was 25 points on a scale of 8 to 40. Areas of opportunity include promoting the importance of postnatal consultations among health personnel and women, reducing waiting times, and improving the content and length of consultations. Factors associated with better perceived quality included being over 35, receiving better content of care for infants, and being treated by private providers, while lower education levels, prior pregnancies, and poor health were associated with lower perceived quality. ConclusionImprovements are needed to ensure all women and infants receive comprehensive postnatal care and perceive it as high quality.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality of newborn care and associated factors: An analysis of the 2022 Kenya demographic and health survey 97%
- The effect of health insurance coverage on antenatal care utilization in Cambodia: A secondary analysis of Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2021-2022 97%
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adoption of policies to improve respectful maternity care in Timor-Leste 97%
- Cultural adaptation of the person-centered maternity care scale at governmental health facilities in Cambodia 97%
- Developing and validating the Nepalese Abuse Assessment Screen (N-AAS) for identifying domestic violence among pregnant women in Nepal 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Barriers and Facilitators to Facility-Based Feeding Support for Small and Sick Newborns in Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study of Clinicians Perspectives 95%
- Cost saving in primary versus tertiary level of reproductive health services in Sana’a, Yemen 95%
- Women’s Awareness of Obstetric Fistula and its Associated Factors Among Reproductive-Age Women in Ethiopia: A Multilevel Analysis Based on National Survey Data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating group-based classes (‘weaning workshops’) to support complementary infant feeding in Irish primary care settings: A cross-sectional survey 92%
- Maternal perception of child weight and concern about child overweight mediates the relationship between child weight and non-responsive feeding practices 92%
- High prevalence of food insecurity, the adverse impact of COVID-19 in Brazilian favela 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 97%
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 96%
- Maternal Postpartum Stress Scale: Translation and validation study of the Chinese version 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.