Back

Understanding the impacts of reductions in local government expenditure on food safety services, England 2009/10 - 2019/20

Murrell, L.; Clough, H.; Gibb, R.; Zhang, X.; Green, M. A.; Buchan, I. E.; Barr, B.; Hungerford, D.

2025-04-04 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.04.04.25325088 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEnvironmental and Regulatory (ER) services, provided by local authorities, play a key role in public health protection. Food safety teams within ER services carry out regular food hygiene inspections, advice and education visits, and investigate foodborne disease outbreaks. Following the 2008 financial crisis, local authorities have faced substantial funding cuts. This study investigates the impact of local government expenditure reductions on food safety services. MethodsWe used fixed effects panel regression to analyse the effect of food safety expenditure reductions on food hygiene staffing levels, food hygiene interventions (e.g. inspection, sampling, advice and education), and the proportion of establishments rated food hygiene compliant. We also examined the effect of staff reductions on the number of interventions achieved and establishment compliance. ResultsA {pound}1 decrease in food safety expenditure per capita was associated with a 2% (95% CI 0.7% to 3.3%) decrease in staffing levels and a 1.7% (95% CI 0.2% to 3.3%) decrease in the number of interventions achieved per establishment. One-unit reduction in staff was associated with a 49.2% (95% CI 18.7%, 87.6%) decrease in the number interventions achieved. We found no evidence of an association between expenditure or staff levels and the proportion of compliant establishments. ConclusionSpending reductions negatively impact the capacity of food safety teams to provide key services. Reductions in food safety expenditure significantly impact food hygiene staff levels and service provision. This raises concerns about the capacity of food safety teams to operate and the potential for increased public risk of gastrointestinal infections.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.9%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.5%
5
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.9%
6
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
8
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Emerging Infectious Diseases
105 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
15
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Public Health
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
21
Public Health Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
European Journal of Public Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Nutrition
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Vaccine
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Eurosurveillance
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
30
BMJ Paediatrics Open
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%