Back

Remote Phenotyping Strategies for Sunflower Flowering Assessments Using Deep Learning Approaches

Volpato, L.; Tirado Tolosa, S.; Potnuru, C.; Jaacks, J.; Layton, J.

2025-04-06 plant biology
10.1101/2025.04.03.646664 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The flowering date of sunflowers is a crucial trait that significantly influences crop management practices and product placement. Traditional ground methods for data collection are labor-intensive and subjective, requiring field scientists to manually estimate and record data in the field. This trait can be measured by counting the number of days from planting until 50% of plants in each research plot have reached flowering at R5 developmental growth stage. However, this method is time-consuming and may overlook valuable information related to flowering rates and duration. Flowering time of sunflower also can be approximated by counting the number of heads (flowers) across multiple dates. We propose a method for rapidly counting sunflower heads to model flower counts over time and estimate flowering time using RGB images acquired by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). The method developed employs a deep learning model trained to detect sunflower heads from UAV imagery and modeling these counts over time using a logistic function to estimate the 50% flowering date. The experimental results obtained from this method enabled estimation of the flowering date with a high correlation to ground measurements (r > 0.91). Significantly, this approach not only reduces labor but also improves the precision of data collection. Moreover, an increase of 6% in heritability across trials, compared to traditional methods, suggests that our approach contributes to a deeper genetic understanding of flowering dynamics. This includes enhanced insights into the timing and rates of flowering, essential for optimizing breeding strategies and understanding genetic responses to environmental conditions. This innovative approach offers a promising avenue for enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of sunflower phenotyping.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Plant Phenomics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.6%
6
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
7
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
10
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
11
in silico Plants
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
12
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
14
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Phytopathology®
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.1%
17
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
AoB PLANTS
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%