Federated Learning for the pathogenicity annotation of genetic variants in multi-site clinical settings
Montalvo, N.; Requena, F.; Capriotti, E.; Rausell, A.
Show abstract
Rare diseases collectively affect 5% of the population. However, fewer than 50% of rare disease patients receive a molecular diagnosis after whole genome sequencing. Supervised machine Learning is a valuable approach for the pathogenicity scoring of human genetic variants. However, existing methods are often trained on curated but limited central repositories, resulting in poor accuracy when tested on external cohorts. Yet, large collections of variants generated at hospitals and research institutions remain inaccessible to machine-learning purposes because of privacy and legal constraints. Federated learning (FL) algorithms have been recently developed enabling institutions to collaboratively train models without sharing their local datasets. Here, we present a proof-of-concept study evaluating the effectiveness of federated learning for the clinical classification of genetic variants. A comprehensive array of diverse FL strategies was assessed for coding and non-coding Single Nucleotide Variants as well as Copy Number Variants. Our results showed that federated models generally achieved comparable or superior performance to traditional centralized learning. In addition, federated models reached a robust generalization to independent sets with smaller data fractions as compared to their centralized model counterparts. Our findings support the adoption of FL to establish secure multi-institutional collaborations in human variant interpretation.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MetaRNN: Differentiating Rare Pathogenic and Rare Benign Missense SNVs and InDels Using Deep Learning 94%
- CACTUS: integrating clonal architecture with genomic clustering and transcriptome profiling of single tumor cells 94%
- Deep transfer learning provides a Pareto improvement for multi-ancestral clinico-genomic prediction of diseases 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variant effect predictor correlation with functional assays is reflective of clinical classification performance 94%
- CaClust: linking genotype to transcriptional heterogeneity of follicular lymphoma using BCR and exomic variants 94%
- Modelling group heteroscedasticity in single-cellRNA-seq pseudo-bulk data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simulation of undiagnosed patients with novel genetic conditions 94%
- FastCCC: A permutation-free framework for scalable, robust, and reference-based cell-cell communication analysis in single cell transcriptomics studies 94%
- vcfdist: Accurately benchmarking phased small variant calls in human genomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subpopulation-specific Machine Learning Prognosis for Underrepresented Patients with Double Prioritized Bias Correction 92%
- Leveraging sequences missing from the human genome to diagnose cancer 92%
- LUNAR: A Deep Learning Model to Predict Glioma Recurrence Using Integrated Genomic and Clinical Data 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.