Design and Validation of a Pragmatic, Scalable Prioritization Tool for Cognitive Screening using the Electronic Health Record
Jaeger, B. C.; Rigdon, J.; Weiss, M.; Yelton, P.; Allen, N.; Pajewski, N. M.; Tajeu, G. S.; Craft, S.; Mielke, M.; Williamson, J. D.
Show abstract
INTRODUCTIONDementia is a disabling condition that progressively impairs daily function. Timely identification of older adults at high risk for dementia or cognitive impairment (a potential precursor) is critical to maximizing opportunities for intervention. METHODSUtilizing structured electronic health record data from 122,633 patients aged 55-80 years, we leveraged demographics, encounter diagnoses, and patient problem lists to develop and prospectively validate a ML model. RESULTSThe ML model achieved a C-statistic of 0.811 (95% confidence interval: 0.810, 0.812) with adequate calibration overall and in subgroups based on race and sex. Recommending screening for patients with 3-year predicted risk > 5%, the ML model obtained satisfactory fairness across race and sex subgroups, with a net benefit of 18 true positive MCI/dementia diagnoses per 1,000 patients. DISCUSSIONThe ML model developed in this study can effectively identify individuals at high risk for a future diagnosis of MCI/dementia, potentially facilitating earlier screening and intervention to reduce the burden of cognition-related disability.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Machine Learning and Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for the Early Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias 96%
- Potentially Modifiable Dementia Risk Factors in Canada: An Analysis of Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging with a Multi-Country Comparison 93%
- Stress internalization associated with cognitive decline among older U.S. Chinese 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimorbidity and risk of incident dementia: role of disease clusters and genetic risk for dementia in a cohort of 206,960 participants 92%
- Diagnostic Codes in AI prediction models and Label Leakage of Same-admission Clinical Outcomes 91%
- Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models 91%