Exploring mental health staff's views and experiences on supporting service users' needs for romantic/intimate relationships: a qualitative systematic review
Wu, E.; Killaspy, H.; Eager, S.; Smith O'Connor, A.; Lloyd-Evans, B.
Show abstract
Mental health service users often voice a need for support regarding romantic/intimate relationships, yet staff face barriers in delivering that support. Given the importance of intimacy to well-being and recovery, this systematic review aimed to synthesise the available qualitative literature on mental health practitioners views and experiences of supporting peoples needs for romantic/intimate relationships. We conducted searches on four research publication databases. Quality of studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Qualitative Research, and results were summarised using meta-aggregation. Confidence in the findings was measured using the ConQual assessment tool. We identified 24 papers which met our inclusion criteria. Four synthesised findings were developed, namely 1) ideas and perceptions surrounding the intimacy needs of service users, 2) service provision at a personal level, 3) fitting intimacy needs into the therapeutic context and 4) service provision at an organisational level. Staff understood the importance of addressing intimacy needs, but voiced a need for improved knowledge, skills and support on how to have such conversations. Our findings can inform mental health policy change and support the development of interventions and guidelines that will enable staff to discuss with service users their needs regarding romantic/intimate relationships.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 97%
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 96%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 96%
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 96%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 96%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 95%
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives 97%
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 95%
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- What has changed in the experiences of people with mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic? Findings from follow-up interviews using a coproduced, participatory qualitative approach 95%
- Impact on mental health care and on mental health service users of the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods survey of UK mental health care staff 92%
- Mental Health of Clinical Staff Working in High-Risk Epidemic and Pandemic Health Emergencies: A Rapid Review of the Evidence and Meta-Analysis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.