Enhancing PET/CT Assessment with Porous 3D Printed Grids: A Pilot Study
Nalla, S. K. K.; Maronnier, Q.; Hazan, T. P.; Kennedy, J.; Caselles, O.
Show abstract
ObjectivePhantom experiments are widely used for standardisation in positron emission tomography (PET), but current practices to do not necessarily reflect clinical reality and require meticulous phantom preparation for repeatability. 3D printing can reduce these limitations by optimizing preparatory methods and improving phantom features. This work proposes employing 3D-printed porous grids as an alternative mechanism to emulate targets with contrast. ApproachAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) cubic grids (4 cm/side) with varying design characteristics and targets were printed. Grids were immersed in a [18F]FDG solution with soap within a conventional phantom. Five consecutive acquisitions were repeated on five different days (Day 0, 1,4-6) using a Discovery MI PET/CT. Target representation index(TRI) and dilution coefficient (DC) were the metrics used for analysis. Friedman test was utilized to study global statistical significance across days. Main ResultsPET images resulted in clear demarcation of various contrast regions produced by the dilution grid. Quantitative metrics showed consistent results across trials, confirming robustness. Dilutions achieved (mean{+/-}std. dev.) were 1.93{+/-}0.14, 2.44{+/-}0.2, and 3.01{+/-}0.08 vs. 2, 2.5 and 3.33 (theoretical), respectively. Observed TRI were in range of 0.4 - 1.2. Correlation across days was strong (p[≥]0.67), and days 1 and 5 had the best pairwise comparable results. Significance3D-printed grids offer a reliable, reproducible alternative for PET/CT assessment. Dozens of targets with background were produced with a single tracer administration. CT attenuation throughout the phantom mimicked water, giving good PET representation of wall-free targets.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Detector Block-Pairwise Dead Time Correction Method for Improved Quantitation with a Dedicated BrainPET Scanner 95%
- Contrast-enhanced photon-counting micro-CT of tumor xenograft models 94%
- Patient-derived PixelPrint phantoms for evaluating clinical imaging performance of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- PET/CT and SPECT/CT imaging of 90 Y hepatic radioembolization at therapeutic and diagnostic activity levels: anthropomorphic phantom study 97%
- Internal calibration for opportunistic computed tomography muscle density analysis 95%
- Single-cell radioluminescence microscopy with two-fold higher sensitivity using dual scintillator configuration 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- 68Ga-Bisphosphonates for the Imaging of Extraosseous Calcification by Positron Emission Tomography 92%
- Inconsistency of AI in Intracranial Aneurysm Detection with Varying Dose and Image Reconstruction 92%
- Radiosynthesis and Preclinical Evaluation of Ga-NOTA-Folate for PET Imaging of Folate Receptor βPositive Macrophages 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- PSMA-Hornet: fully-automated, multi-target segmentation of healthy organs in PSMA PET/CT images 94%
- Experimental investigation of oxygen diffusion in the peak and valley region of minibeam patterns during X-Ray irradiation 91%
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.