Back

Maximizing the fidelity of a photovoltaic subretinal prosthesis for human patients

Jensen, N.; Goldstein, A. K.; Ly, K.; Devaud, Q.; Palanker, D.

2025-04-05 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.03.31.646451 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivePRIMA subretinal implants provide prosthetic vision to patients blinded by age-related macular degeneration, with acuity closely matching the sampling limit of the pixel pitch: a single 100 {micro}m pixel per line of a letter corresponds to 20/420 acuity. Decreasing the pixel size in the same flat geometry is difficult due to the constrained electric field, especially considering a 40 {micro}m thick debris layer separating the implant from the target neurons. Here we optimize the electrode design to help overcome such limitations. MethodsAn end-to-end modeling pipeline combines the retinal photovoltaic implant simulator (RPSim) based on the Xyce circuit simulator with an interface to COMSOL Multiphysics for electric field modelling. It was used to generate and characterize implants in an open-loop sampling-based optimization. Implant performance was evaluated with respect to voltage drop across bipolar cells (representing the stimulation strength), pattern contrast, and neural selectivity. ResultsThe highest selectivity in stimulation of bipolar cells was achieved with arrays having active electrodes on pillars and return electrodes connected in a mesh surrounding the photovoltaic pixels in the array. Such a design, even with pixels down to 20 {micro}m, provides stimulation strength exceeding, and contrast similar to that of flat 100 {micro}m PRIMA pixels. ConclusionUsing a novel 3-D electrode design, the pitch of the photovoltaic array can be decreased to 20 {micro}m, while providing performance that exceeds the flat 100 {micro}m PRIMA pixels. SignificanceIn humans, 20 {micro}m resolution on the retina corresponds to a visual acuity of 20/80 - a five times improvement compared to the current clinical device.

Published in Journal of Neural Engineering (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.