Acceptability and perceived barriers to adoption of the core outcome set for maternal and neonatal health research and surveillance during emerging and ongoing epidemic threats (MNH-EPI-COS). An online survey
Klein, K.; Alonso, J. P.; Berrueta, M.; Oladapo, O. T.; Bonet, M.; Belizan, M.; Pingray, V.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe MNH-EPI-COS is a core outcome set designed to standardize outcome selection in maternal and neonatal health research during outbreaks. It was developed through a four-stage modified Delphi process involving a large group of international stakeholders who assessed outcomes relevance through online surveys, followed by consensus meetings with a subgroup of stakeholders to finalize the COS. The objective of this study is to evaluate the acceptability of the full MNH-EPI-COS among key stakeholders, identify anticipated barriers to its adoption, and assess agreement on the inclusion of individual outcomes, their definitions, and the perceived feasibility of data collection. MethodsAn online consultation was conducted using an electronic semi-structured survey targeting senior clinical and public health experts and civil society representatives involved in the earlier phases of MNH-EPI-COS development but not in consensus meetings. ResultsOf the 118 invited stakeholders, 100 completed the survey. The majority (95%) agreed that the MNH-EPI-COS captures the most important outcomes, is likely acceptable to key stakeholders (94%), and facilitates timely evidence generation (92%). Additionally, 75% expressed intent to use it. Over 80% of participants agreed with the individual outcomes and their definitions, except for "skin-to-skin contact" and "breastfeeding," which were acceptable to 67% and 74%, respectively. Concerns were raised about the feasibility of measuring specific outcomes across diverse settings due to the substantial effort and resources required. Key barriers to adoption include knowledge, skills, and understanding gaps and the lack of practical resources. ConclusionsThe MNH-EPI-COS, including its outcomes and definitions, was highly acceptable to the larger group of stakeholders involved in the early stages of its development. However, feasibility concerns remain. Successful implementation will require effective dissemination, targeted training, data collection resources, and real-world evaluation.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal and perinatal health research during emerging and ongoing epidemic threats: a landscape analysis and expert consultation 95%
- Voices from the frontline: findings from a thematic analysis of a rapid online global survey of maternal and newborn health professionals facing the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Designathons in Health Research: A Global Systematic Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of prenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation on birth weight in Ethiopia: protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial 95%
- Birhan Maternal and Child Health cohort: a study protocol 94%
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A community-based mentoring scheme for pregnant and parenting adolescents in Sierra Leone: protocol for a hybrid pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 94%
- Protocol For The Development Of A Core Outcome Set For Respectful Maternal And Newborn Care In A Low-Middle Income Setting 93%
- COVID-19 and pregnancy: An umbrella review of clinical presentation, vertical transmission, and maternal and perinatal outcomes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Hair salons as a promising space to provide HIV and sexual and reproductive health services for young women in Lesotho: A citizen scientist mixed-methods study 91%
- Comparative analysis of policies and programs to support families and children during COVID-19 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.