Back

The training specificity versus structural adaptation paradox: Differential effects of isokinetic concentric and eccentric resistance training on muscle architecture and function in young men

Nunes, J. P.; Nosaka, K.; Blazevich, A. J.

2025-04-01 sports medicine
10.1101/2025.03.31.25324923 medRxiv
Show abstract

It is unclear whether muscle functional adaptations to concentric (CON-RT) and eccentric (ECC-RT) resistance training are most specific to their exercise characteristics or the structural adaptations they evoke. In this study, the effects of effort- and volume-matched CON-RT and ECC-RT on regional hypertrophy, muscle architecture, and function were compared, and associations between the outcomes were explored. Twelve trained young men (25.5{+/-}3.6y) completed 18 isokinetic ankle-dorsiflexion exercise sessions over 6 weeks: CON-RT in one leg and ECC-RT in the other (2-4 sets, 6-10 maximal repetitions, 10{degrees}/s). Tibialis anterior size and architecture (ultrasound imaging) and maximum voluntary dorsiflexion function (isokinetic dynamometry) were assessed. Muscle thickness increased similarly between conditions and across proximal-distal regions (8%), pennation angle increased more in CON-RT (8%) than ECC-RT (4%), and fascicle length increased only after ECC-RT (7%). Functional adaptations were more closely associated with specific structural adaptations than with contraction mode, velocity, or angle. Isometric torque increased similarly in both conditions overall (8%) but CON-RT improved only at shorter muscle lengths and shifted the peak-torque angle leftward, whereas ECC-RT improved at both shorter and longer lengths and broadened the torque-angle plateau, which was associated with fascicle length increases. ECC-RT produced greater increases in both eccentric (13%) and concentric torques (17%) than CON-RT (3%, 9%, respectively), and changes were similar across velocities - contrary to the training specificity theory. Changes in pennation angle were associated with dynamic strength changes. These findings suggest that muscle function adapts to the structural changes induced by training, regardless of the training scheme used.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.9%
2
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
3
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
8
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
9
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
10
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
12
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
15
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
17
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.5%